Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MIAJudges: Difference between revisions
Courcelles (talk | contribs) Archiving case section to w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MIAJudges/Archive (using spihelper.js) Tags: Replaced Manual revert |
No edit summary Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|MIAJudges}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|MIAJudges}} |
||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===23 October 2023=== |
|||
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}} |
|||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
|||
{{sock list|1=8planets|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
|||
MIAJudges had an almost exclusive interest in judges and was cBanned on 20 July. 8planets was created 6 days later and immediately began editing articles of judges. There is no overlap in specific articles that I saw, but both exclusively edited judge articles. Both use identical-style edit summaries, often one-word such as "Picture" "Link", or the occasional "Missing word". Finally, 8planets added to their own talk page [[Special:diff/1178018009|this list of judges without pictures]] a month ago, then went to MLAJudges website earlier today to [[Special:diff/1181448088|remove that identical list made by MLAJudges from MLAJudges' talk page]]. It seems possible that MLAJudges made a sock, copied their old task list, then realized that it was incriminating and tried to cover their tracks.[[User:EducatedRedneck|EducatedRedneck]] ([[User talk:EducatedRedneck|talk]]) 10:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [[User:EducatedRedneck|EducatedRedneck]] ([[User talk:EducatedRedneck|talk]]) 10:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
|||
:<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
|||
Revision as of 10:35, 23 October 2023
MIAJudges
- MIAJudges (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
23 October 2023
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- 8planets (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
MIAJudges had an almost exclusive interest in judges and was cBanned on 20 July. 8planets was created 6 days later and immediately began editing articles of judges. There is no overlap in specific articles that I saw, but both exclusively edited judge articles. Both use identical-style edit summaries, often one-word such as "Picture" "Link", or the occasional "Missing word". Finally, 8planets added to their own talk page this list of judges without pictures a month ago, then went to MLAJudges website earlier today to remove that identical list made by MLAJudges from MLAJudges' talk page. It seems possible that MLAJudges made a sock, copied their old task list, then realized that it was incriminating and tried to cover their tracks.EducatedRedneck (talk) 10:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC) EducatedRedneck (talk) 10:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.