NZYQ v Minister for Immigration: Difference between revisions
Søndermarken (talk | contribs) added Category:High Court of Australia cases; removed {{uncategorized}} using HotCat |
Added Wikisource link |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The case resulted in the court effectively requiring the immediate release of multiple people from Australian immigration detention. Some of those released had criminal histories and were said to be a danger to the community, creating political issues for the [[Albanese government|Albanese Government]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-11-09 |title=In just 16 minutes, the High Court made a decision that put Albanese in a tight spot |language=en-AU |work=ABC News |url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-09/twenty-year-detention-laws-overturned-in-high-court/103081400 |access-date=2023-12-15}}</ref> The government responded by legislating a regime imposing strict visa conditions on the group of people released, with mandatory minimum carceral sentences of one year for those breaching the conditions.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Twomey |first=Anne |date=2023-12-13 |title=New laws to deal with immigration detainees were rushed, leading to legal risks |url=http://theconversation.com/new-laws-to-deal-with-immigration-detainees-were-rushed-leading-to-legal-risks-219384 |access-date=2023-12-15 |website=The Conversation |language=en-US}}</ref> |
The case resulted in the court effectively requiring the immediate release of multiple people from Australian immigration detention. Some of those released had criminal histories and were said to be a danger to the community, creating political issues for the [[Albanese government|Albanese Government]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-11-09 |title=In just 16 minutes, the High Court made a decision that put Albanese in a tight spot |language=en-AU |work=ABC News |url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-09/twenty-year-detention-laws-overturned-in-high-court/103081400 |access-date=2023-12-15}}</ref> The government responded by legislating a regime imposing strict visa conditions on the group of people released, with mandatory minimum carceral sentences of one year for those breaching the conditions.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Twomey |first=Anne |date=2023-12-13 |title=New laws to deal with immigration detainees were rushed, leading to legal risks |url=http://theconversation.com/new-laws-to-deal-with-immigration-detainees-were-rushed-leading-to-legal-risks-219384 |access-date=2023-12-15 |website=The Conversation |language=en-US}}</ref> |
||
{{Wikisource|NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs}} |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
||
Revision as of 09:17, 4 January 2024
NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, or NZYQ is a decision of the High Court of Australia.
It is an important case in Australian constitutional law. Most notably, the newly constituted Gageler Court overturned the precedent of Al-Kateb v Godwin, a 2004 decision of the Gleeson Court which had held the indefinite detention of stateless persons to be lawful.[1]
The case resulted in the court effectively requiring the immediate release of multiple people from Australian immigration detention. Some of those released had criminal histories and were said to be a danger to the community, creating political issues for the Albanese Government.[2] The government responded by legislating a regime imposing strict visa conditions on the group of people released, with mandatory minimum carceral sentences of one year for those breaching the conditions.[3]
References
- ^ "In just 16 minutes, the High Court made a decision that put Albanese in a tight spot". ABC News. 2023-11-09. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
- ^ "In just 16 minutes, the High Court made a decision that put Albanese in a tight spot". ABC News. 2023-11-09. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
- ^ Twomey, Anne (2023-12-13). "New laws to deal with immigration detainees were rushed, leading to legal risks". The Conversation. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
 | This article related to Australian law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |