Talk:Waverley Steps: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Pinging contributors →Splitting proposal |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
: {{ping |Cnwilliams|Tagishsimon|Stephencdickson}}. I am pinging some of the contributors to this article in case they wish to comment. [[User:Mike Marchmont|Mike Marchmont]] ([[User talk:Mike Marchmont|talk]]) 16:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
: {{ping |Cnwilliams|Tagishsimon|Stephencdickson}}. I am pinging some of the contributors to this article in case they wish to comment. [[User:Mike Marchmont|Mike Marchmont]] ([[User talk:Mike Marchmont|talk]]) 16:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
::I am pro-splitting. It just makes sense, not least because following a link to the film and finding an article chiefly about the steps themselves is rather confusing. In addition, the film is named for the steps but is not chiefly about them so the current sharing is somewhat misleading. [[User:CPClegg|CPClegg]] ([[User talk:CPClegg|talk]]) 09:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:43, 15 January 2024
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Splitting proposal
The article clearly covers two distinct subjects:
- The stairs leading into the station.
- The short documentary film.
Apart from the name, there is almost no connection between these two subjects. The film is not about the steps, and the steps do not feature in the film.
I therefore propose that the article be split into two: Waverley Steps and Waverley Steps (film) respectively.
Alternatively, the information from the current article concerning the stairs could be transferred to Waverley station, leaving the current article to focus on the film.
Please comment. Mike Marchmont (talk) 15:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Cnwilliams, Tagishsimon, and Stephencdickson:. I am pinging some of the contributors to this article in case they wish to comment. Mike Marchmont (talk) 16:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am pro-splitting. It just makes sense, not least because following a link to the film and finding an article chiefly about the steps themselves is rather confusing. In addition, the film is named for the steps but is not chiefly about them so the current sharing is somewhat misleading. CPClegg (talk) 09:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)