User talk:Mrlob: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:55, 3 April 2007

Thanks

I just wanted to thank you for working on and creating the pages Lone Horn and Touch the Clouds. I appreciate the interest you have in their cultures. Best regards, oncamera^(t) 15:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Oncamera, for adding just the painting that I've mentioned in the article. I've some trouble ith adding pictures, so again, thanks a lot!!! Mrlob 15:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		A Barnstar you truly deserved, Mrlob, for contributing a lot to my user portal!

Kermanshahi 15:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you a lot, Kermanshahi! the Honorable Mrlob 16:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Mrlob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

84.87.138.105 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Ayatollah Rhobijnie". The reason given for Ayatollah Rhobijnie's block is: "sosck puppetry to avoid a block".

Blocking administrator: Chrislk02 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Obvious sockpuppet of User:Kermanshahi -- Netsnipe ► 19:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here, consider this, it is to those who baneed me and blocked innocent people:

Well, I won't any longer denie, that I am Rhobijnie and Kashwialariski. But that makes me a sockpuppeteer, not a sockpuppet. I can't be Kermanshahi, because I registered as a user before he did. But I know him from school, so that is why I contrubutede to his user-age, and helped him build it up. My account is older than his. That makes it highly unlikely\impossible for me to be his sockpuppet; more likely it would be, for him to be mine. But Rhobijnie and Kashwialariski are mine, so that makes me a sockpuppeteer. Not a sockpuppeteer. Please, auto-unblock me, and personally block me again, someone. A sockpuppeteer shouldn't be banned, but temperily banned. And please, unblock that poor Kermanshahi; he hasn't got nothing to do with this; he is innocent. Please, consider this, and take my humble apologies. I'll accept, whatever you decide whats' best, even when it is not something I like much. But, please, don't let innocent people pay for my stupidity...

Per Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kermanshahi, your indefinite block has been reduced to 2 weeks as of today. If you are caught violating the Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy again, you may find yourself indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia. We have zero tolerance for this abuse of trust in the community. If you want to become an administrator, you need to earn our trust through good contributions and active participation in the community, not by handing out barnstars and voting on WP:RFA amongst your friends -- we've seen it many times before and can recognize when someone's trying to deceive us a mile away. I hope you've learnt your lesson, because it'll take you some time and a lot of good article edits to repair your reputation and our trust. -- Netsnipe ► 13:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are right about that, Netsnipe! I'll try to do my best, restoring my reputation! Thanks, for unblocking me (after two weeks)!

Mrlob 16:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok now I have enough of it! you made a new sockpuppet account: MaoVerdonk, I know because I know you and I am not taking this, finally this sockpuppet buisiness is finished and now you are trying to bring it back! Making artickless: sockpuppets of Kermanshahi! Don't dear ever doing this again I am going to contact Netsnipe and I will get you banned for this and don't you ever edit my users page again. It aint my fault you got no stars and I know for a fact you got Ayatollah Rhobijnie and Kashwialariski banned for nothing. And oh yeah you're not honorable you never made anything so get that out of your sig! Kermanshahi 15:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

my very own defence

You are right about the signature; it is currently just;

the Honorable Mrlob 15:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And about the rest; I feel personally attacked by you: I have made some good articles and contributions. In case you didn't notice; I have been blocked for to weeks, and that is the reason why I am not currently making changes away from my own user-talk. I can't evn stop you editing my very own user-page! Oh, and about those noobs; I don't mind, having them blocked!