Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Catholic Church/1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating GAR nomination page (GAR-helper) |
El Sandifer (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: {{GAR/current}}<br/> |
: {{GAR/current}}<br/> |
||
Several uncited sections, including almost the entire first section of the History section. History focuses disproportionately on 20th and 21st century. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 17:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC) |
Several uncited sections, including almost the entire first section of the History section. History focuses disproportionately on 20th and 21st century. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 17:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Disagree that the history weighting is a significant problem. Might require a minor rebalancing—-I’m not sure why John Paul II has his own section while other popes do not (aside from Francis, but the case for having a section on the current pope is strong)—-but that’s a modest edit, not a reason to delist. The several uncited paragraphs in the History section (which look to be the only significantly uncited section to me) do need fixed, but I note that [[History of the Catholic Church]] has a pretty well-cited early history section, so that shouldn’t be a hard fix. Reassessment seems a pretty big overreaction for these problems—-it’s pretty firmly [[WP:JUSTDOIT]] territory. [[User:El Sandifer|El Sandifer]] ([[User talk:El Sandifer|talk]]) 20:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:25, 2 February 2024
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
Several uncited sections, including almost the entire first section of the History section. History focuses disproportionately on 20th and 21st century. Z1720 (talk) 17:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Disagree that the history weighting is a significant problem. Might require a minor rebalancing—-I’m not sure why John Paul II has his own section while other popes do not (aside from Francis, but the case for having a section on the current pope is strong)—-but that’s a modest edit, not a reason to delist. The several uncited paragraphs in the History section (which look to be the only significantly uncited section to me) do need fixed, but I note that History of the Catholic Church has a pretty well-cited early history section, so that shouldn’t be a hard fix. Reassessment seems a pretty big overreaction for these problems—-it’s pretty firmly WP:JUSTDOIT territory. El Sandifer (talk) 20:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)