Jump to content

Talk:The Chase (1994 film): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
fmt
Cameos: Seconding The Section Over-long Plot Summary: Runs long, may violate copyright
Line 6: Line 6:


:Yeah, I'd say that would be something worth inclusion in the article. Go for it. --[[User:UNHchabo|UNHchabo]] 10:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
:Yeah, I'd say that would be something worth inclusion in the article. Go for it. --[[User:UNHchabo|UNHchabo]] 10:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

:I agree. The high number of cameos is most likely a notable aspect of the film, a-la [[Farce of the Penguins]]-- [[User:Lostprophyt|Lostprophyt]] 17:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

== Over-long Plot Summary ==

Wikipedia has been curtailing alot of the plot summarys in articles on films, citing that such detailed descriptions of said films might violate copyright. While we all know that Copyright as it stands today is totally broken, but these are still the rules. The summary, while as-yet incomplete, is still failry long and detailed. I suggest that it be shortened a bit further to avoid this nag in the future.

[[User:Lostprophyt|Lostprophyt]] 17:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:56, 5 April 2007

WikiProject iconFilm Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Cameos

Is it worth a section regarding the ridiculous number of cameos in this film? Cary Elwes as a newscaster, Flea and Kiedis as the rednecks, Ron Jeremy as a cameraman, and many more. If it's worth doing, I'll try to get a complete list. ThuranX 15:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'd say that would be something worth inclusion in the article. Go for it. --UNHchabo 10:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The high number of cameos is most likely a notable aspect of the film, a-la Farce of the Penguins-- Lostprophyt 17:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Over-long Plot Summary

Wikipedia has been curtailing alot of the plot summarys in articles on films, citing that such detailed descriptions of said films might violate copyright. While we all know that Copyright as it stands today is totally broken, but these are still the rules. The summary, while as-yet incomplete, is still failry long and detailed. I suggest that it be shortened a bit further to avoid this nag in the future.

Lostprophyt 17:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]