|
Hi Synoreum,
Some of my edits to the Rhinovirus article were recently reverted and tagged as vandalism by your account through Ultraviolet. While these were major changes to an article, they were made in good faith to correct for major redundancy, lack of summaries, and out of date information. Can you review these changes? If necessary, please provide constructive feedback on whether this otherwise violates editing policies.
@WalkEFelix WalkEFelix (talk) 07:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Y A mistake was made. I apologize, it seems like I had made a mistake and as such I have restored your edits. Your warnings have also been removed. Synorem (talk) 07:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The way that it is now, all of the alternate universe things are grouped together aside from the bit about the Ravagers. On pages for a number of other Marvel characters, their alternate universe versions have been organized into a list like that. Examples include Gamora, Steve Rogers and Peggy Carter. I was just changing the format to match what was done to other pages which looks a lot better. It's really clunky and too clustered together like this and it looks better organized as a list like that. Thanos just has too many alternate selves for it to work as a single paragraph group. 32.220.224.39 (talk) 19:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Your edit was factually incorrect. You stated Thanos had been "defeated by the illuminati" instead of by Supreme Strange. Sources, specifically a quote from Professor X state otherwise.
- Oh!!! You reverted the whole thing, just change the title of the section instead. I thought that writing Supreme Strange as the title for a section about Thanos didn't make much sense. My mistake.--32.220.224.39 (talk) 19:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- PS: the text in that section was what was already there in the Other Versions section that I reorganized, I didn't write that, I just moved it. In case you were talking about the text instead of the title itself.--32.220.224.39 (talk) 19:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello synorem,I just noticed you reverted my category add that i did on Saim Ayub’s page of Test crickrter but if you actually look at his biography he was once selected for a test series against Australia so that technically makes him a test cricketer. Wikicontributerr (talk) 06:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Y A mistake was made. I apologize, it seems like I had made a mistake and as such I have restored your edits. Your warnings have also been removed. Synorem (talk) 06:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You've reverted a cleanup I made on the above page, in effect creating a nonsense statement. Please desist. Hibarnacle (talk) 04:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Your edit contained the phrase "the the first king to construct something" which amounted to unconstructive editing. My revert was for the sake of accuracy. If you believe a page is 'in serious need of cleanup' please use the correct tags as seen here.
Hello,
I removed some candidates from the list of candidates who have since withdrawn. I have noticed other editors have done the same action on author primary/caucus articles, as those candidates (Christie, Burgum, etc.) are no longer declaring candidacy.
Thank you Colin.1678 (talk) 21:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- If possible, when removing large portions of texts adding an edit summary helps recent change patrollers like myself understand why you had removed the text you had. If possible, including a source that shows the candidates have withdrawn always helps too. Thank you :) Synorem (talk) 02:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop removing my #KingKotaMovement #WeWantDakota #VegaKingdom #WeWantZelina Zelina and Dakota know about it, that's why I'm adding it 2603:7080:EEF0:60B0:4D7C:CEF7:A9B1:B94C (talk) 13:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Simply adding the hashtags to their page is not constructive. Please see WP:NOT.
Hi there,
Regarding your reverts/edits to Coquettes, what's going on there? 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Filmssssssssssss Not sure what the deal is with the foreign article, however my revert relates to the vandalism/un-constructive edit that served as a climate-activism warning. I've fixed up the language now, removing the vandalism
 Synorem (talk) 15:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am attempting to edit errors, and remove unsupported and unnecessary statements on this page? Are you a member of the LDS Church? WarBishop (talk) 14:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello there. I do not know what the LDS Church is, nor am I a member of it. I am, however, a member of Wikipedia - and your edit went against Wikipedia's rule on unsourced content. If you going to amend information, please cite your sources to ensure verifiability of your information. Synorem (talk) 14:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- How do I cite the fact that an unsupported opinion statement was removed? I’m am senior clergy of this Church WarBishop (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- You changed the word "alleged" to "confirmed". Could you include who or what confirmed this? How did you know this were confirmed? Synorem (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Got it, Yes, their are statements from his wife and the postal record. I will find them. WarBishop (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Awesome, thanks in advance! Just redo your edit and cite these records and your changes should be all good :) Synorem (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|
Questions & concerns regarding RCP actions
Awards & Wikipedia barnstars relating to RCP