Jump to content

Talk:Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
HagermanBot (talk | contribs)
m 219.64.148.36 didn't sign: "Their role is Violence against Tamils"
Line 25: Line 25:
What about the prohibiton of the party and its legalization and ereturn into the political mainstream since the 1990s? [[User:Krankman|Krankman]] 14:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
What about the prohibiton of the party and its legalization and ereturn into the political mainstream since the 1990s? [[User:Krankman|Krankman]] 14:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


== Their role is Violence against Tamils ==
== Their role in Violence against Tamils ==


Could someone provide their accurate role in Violence against Tamils ? They are the ones who are in alliance in Rajapakshe and had been a great thorn in the peace process.
Could someone provide their accurate role in Violence against Tamils ? They are the ones who are in alliance in Rajapakshe and had been a great thorn in the peace process.
````Gaja <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/219.64.148.36|219.64.148.36]] ([[User talk:219.64.148.36|talk]]) 12:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
[[User:219.64.148.36|219.64.148.36]] 12:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC) <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/219.64.148.36|219.64.148.36]] ([[User talk:219.64.148.36|talk]]) 12:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->

Revision as of 12:09, 6 April 2007

POV?

Content of the article seems factually correct but the highly loaded(charged) wording shoud be corrected. Explanation is in Maxist point of view.

Only devotees of the JVP could possibly be interested in the better than two-thirds of this article that goes on about splits in the 'movement'.

Tamil Representation

Completely unmentioned is the lack of tamil representation in the JVP compared to other Marxist parties in the country.

1971 Uprising

Why is there no mention of the old leaders? Podi Athula, Loku Athula, Uyangoda, etc???

1983 Ethnic riots

What is "Vasudeva Baahu Vikrambaahu Kanakaratna’s" Party ? The NSSP? Who is Kanakaratna?

1989 violence

i've tried to add some counter-balance to this marxist apology but it's a terrible article and needs more attention than i can give. Aside from the prose, however hard it is to pin down the facts surrounding the JVP in 1989, anyone who was there at the time knows that they were in the thick of the appalling violence and a primary actor. This must be told. Gladstone 14:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

It appears that most of the "Founding" section is adapted from the JVP's web site [1] which is clearly marked as copyrighted material. Some sentences are verbatim. Tyronen 21:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Developments

What about the prohibiton of the party and its legalization and ereturn into the political mainstream since the 1990s? Krankman 14:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Their role in Violence against Tamils

Could someone provide their accurate role in Violence against Tamils ? They are the ones who are in alliance in Rajapakshe and had been a great thorn in the peace process. 219.64.148.36 12:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.64.148.36 (talk) 12:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]