User talk:Tj363: Difference between revisions
→Edit warring: new section |
→Edit warring: Reply |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article [[Help:Talk pages|talk pages]] to try to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Through discussion|consensus]]. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|dispute resolution options]] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Glman|glman]] ([[User talk:Glman|talk]]) 20:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC) |
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article [[Help:Talk pages|talk pages]] to try to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Through discussion|consensus]]. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|dispute resolution options]] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Glman|glman]] ([[User talk:Glman|talk]]) 20:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
:As you mentioned previously, I responded by "stating that [I am] not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits". Please refrain from undoing the edit or provide your explanation as to why you are reverting back the edit. [[User:Tj363|Tj363]] ([[User talk:Tj363#top|talk]]) 20:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:31, 15 February 2024
February 2024
Hello, Tj363. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Yale Bulldogs football, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. glman (talk) 16:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please do not undo the edit. I am not being compensated for the edit. The University and the athletic department do not want incorrect information on this page. Tj363 (talk) 17:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
![Information icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f0/Information_orange.svg/25px-Information_orange.svg.png)
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Tj363, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tj363|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. glman (talk) 13:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Edit warring
Hi Tj363! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. glman (talk) 20:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- As you mentioned previously, I responded by "stating that [I am] not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits". Please refrain from undoing the edit or provide your explanation as to why you are reverting back the edit. Tj363 (talk) 20:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)