User talk:Blubewwy

Archives (Index)

2023/February 2023/March 2023/April 2023/May 2023/July 2023/October 2023/November 2023/December 2024/February 2024/March

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

"Previous wording flowed better"?

I'm referring to this edit on the Hazbin Hotel page. Since I want to avoid an edit war, I want to know your reasoning before changing anything back, because I believe your edit actually makes the flow of the sentence worse in every way.

• I am of the opinion that the phrase "Adam hints that he wants revenge on Hell for what they did to the exterminator" is speculatory and thus doesn't flow well at all (not to mention Adam doesn't really mention the dead angel ever again, most of it is Carmilla, Vaggie, or Velvette).
• Meanwhile, the phrase "who is revealed to be a former angel" is superfluous, and the "who is revealed to be" could be outright removed since the sentence would flow better that way; generally, I don't really like saying something is revealed to the audience, and in this case it isn't really revealed to the characters either since they all already know/figured it out.
• Lastly, you removed the mention that the earlier extermination is first mentioned during Charlie's meeting with Adam during the song "Hell is Forever", instead claiming it is during the TV broadcast that interrupts Vaggie's ad, and I genuinely want to know why you would change the timing of a reveal to be the wrong time.

Unnamed anon (talk) 05:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

@Unnamed anon The fact that Adam doesn't mention the dead exterminator ever again is a good point, so upon reflection, you can remove that if you want. If I removed the mention of the ad being interrupted, that was genuinely an accident on my part, and I apologize for that. That can be readded as well. However, I do feel that the phrase "who is revealed to be a former angel" is important, because this was specifically the episode where this information was revealed. Without it, the phrase "Vaggie, a former angel" almost feels like this was information that had been previously known in the show. Blubewwy (talk) 12:48, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Charlie Morningstar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlie Morningstar, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Morningstar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

@Blubewwy, I would definitely recommend you weigh in. I attempted to do so myself, but I may have not done the best job to be honest. Will be trying to contact more people about this to get more eyes on it. Historyday01 (talk) 03:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Lloyd Garmadon

I know the category is called half-demons but Lloyd is less than half, so he does not exactly fit that category either. If he is into the half-demons category despite being less than half, I do not see why we can not add him in the dragons category.--2A01:5A8:30D:955E:C881:7139:5183:EFCE (talk) 08:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)