User talk:Malleus Fatuorum: Difference between revisions
Traditions of the Georgia Institute of Technology listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) |
Onegreatjoke (talk | contribs) Hull City A.F.C. listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
== Good article reassessment for [[Traditions of the Georgia Institute of Technology]] == |
== Good article reassessment for [[Traditions of the Georgia Institute of Technology]] == |
||
[[Traditions of the Georgia Institute of Technology]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Traditions of the Georgia Institute of Technology/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Femke|—Femke 🐦]] ([[User talk:Femke|talk]]) 09:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC) |
[[Traditions of the Georgia Institute of Technology]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Traditions of the Georgia Institute of Technology/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Femke|—Femke 🐦]] ([[User talk:Femke|talk]]) 09:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Good article reassessment for [[Hull City A.F.C.]] == |
|||
[[Hull City A.F.C.]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hull City A.F.C./1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Onegreatjoke|Onegreatjoke]] ([[User talk:Onegreatjoke|talk]]) 00:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:40, 16 April 2024
Redirect to:
Good article reassessment for Buncefield fire
Buncefield fire has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Femke (alt) (talk) 08:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Astronomy
Astronomy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Louise Nevelson
Louise Nevelson has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Ppt91talk 18:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Telecommunications
Telecommunications has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Gulf Stream
Gulf Stream has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. PhotographyEdits (talk) 08:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Dundee United F.C.
Dundee United F.C. has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:31, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Postal codes in Canada
Postal codes in Canada has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:07, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Whiddy Island disaster
Whiddy Island disaster has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:49, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Forth (programming language)
Forth (programming language) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for STS-74
STS-74 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 03:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Continuous distillation
Continuous distillation has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 04:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Nina Simone
Nina Simone has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Schierbecker (talk) 18:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for International Aerial Robotics Competition
International Aerial Robotics Competition has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 04:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Traditions of the Georgia Institute of Technology
Traditions of the Georgia Institute of Technology has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 09:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Hull City A.F.C.
Hull City A.F.C. has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)