User talk:AirshipJungleman29

I need your help

Hello, Airship the page wizard. I need your help with some stuff. First i need you to please draft Barefooted Flight, because it's not ready for mainspace, Second i need your help to moving Pages like moving First Kazakh-Dzungar War into First Kazakh–Dzungar War, Draft:Dzungar-Russian conflicts into Draft:Dzungar–Russian conflicts mainly of the use of hyphens instead of using the En dash, move Battle of Urmity to Erdeni's first campaign against Kazakhs because the battle should be a section and it should be prior to Erdeni's second campaign against Kazakhs (1640). Thanks. - The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 08:12, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

HorseBro the hemionus, I will not be drafting Barefooted Flight per WP:DRAFTNO. I have moved the next two pages, and please feel free to do the last yourself. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:42, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Thabk you, Mr. JungleMan. - The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Also, HorseBro the hemionus would you mind changing your signature to something approaching your username? It's very confusing at present. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:50, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, could you give me like more tips on nominating pages for WP:Good Article? As i think few pages nominated might fail the criterion or fail something from the review, any more tips Mr. Airship the Page Wizard? — The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 14:22, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Can you stop calling me that? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:27, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Alright, but any tips? — The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 14:44, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

For the life of me HorseBro the hemionus I cannot understand why you persist in churning out these poorly-sourced WP:SYNTHy "Kazakh-Dzungar War of X-date to Y-date" articles, when the main Kazakh–Dzungar Wars article is right there in a bad state! Can you tell me what's wrong with improving it?

You do not get special credit by creating several bad articles. In fact, it just makes you're trying to inflate the importance of the topics you're interested in. Do not imagine that you're the first one to come up with this idea; last year, five editors were topic banned for engaging in the same sort of inflating and POV-pushing in the field of Indian military history.

If you continue on this path, I can tell you you'll end up like your friend-turned-foe Shadow. 547: that is, blocked, possibly for good. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Oh I see, i know understand that most of those are redundant, I'll proceed to add them to the Main Page and I'll ask questions from you as you have more experience than me or just the WP:TeaHouse.— The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 00:33, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

So well, Airhsip the article wizard — may please help me give tips for letting an article meet the GA requirements? If you are interested please give tips and stuff to make it eligible because i pretty much know you for making dozens of GA. - The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 15:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Needs better grammar—I suggest a visit to WP:GOCE—and more explanation/background for those of us who have no idea what's going on. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:14, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

And once again, please consider changing your signature to something that remotely approaches your username. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:15, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Oh and also any tips on editing on extremely long articles to make them comfortable to read it? - The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 14:13, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Follow WP:MTAU, MOS:LAYOUT, and get someone from WP:GOCE to look over it. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:46, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

And also how do i add wikiprojects to a page of an article and let it be reviewed for b class article again? - The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 07:16, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

You can request B-class review at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:11, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Procedural issue with Hooshmand Dehghan GA review

Hi AirshipJungleman29,

I’m writing to you because my GA nomination for Hooshmand Dehghan was failed while I was caught in the 2026 Internet blackout in Iran. The reviewer (Magnesium Cube) gave me a 3-day window to respond and then closed it right when I had no access.

The fail was based on AI claims, but the article has 407 revisions and 24 editors (including recent copyedits by Gazelle55). If you look at my edits on Jan 7-8, I was manually adding specific page numbers from physical books like Browne 1918—something an AI simply doesn't do.

It’s frustrating to lose weeks of waiting in the queue because of a 15-day blackout. Since the article is already well-developed and verified by others, could you help me fast-track it or put it back in its original spot so I don't have to wait another few weeks or months?

Thanks,

Mojgoon ^talk 18:55, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Just a brief update:

MagnesiumCube has just posted a note on the Hooshmand Dehghan talk page, clarifying that the previous AI concerns were misplaced and explaining the context of the internet blackout. I thought you might want to see this update. Best regards. Mojgoon ^talk 20:48, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Question

Hello, @AirshipJungleman29! Please advise me on how to handle the situation regarding @HorseBro the hemionus. I have repeatedly explained to this editor that Wikipedia articles must be based on the findings of professional historians, yet he seems to ignore everything I write. He has published two articles: "Kazakh-Dzungar War of 1708–1718" and "Kazakh-Dzungar War of 1731–1735." However, not a single historian consolidates the conflicts within these timeframes into single, unified wars; these were essentially separate campaigns. For instance, V. Z. Galina identifies only a war from 1708–1712, and that is all. Regarding the 1731–1735 period, Kushkumbayev (a source cited in the footnotes) explicitly writes that the first half of the 1730s consisted of mutual minor skirmishes. Furthermore, he is preparing another draft, "Kazakh-Dzungar War of 1635–1658," which similarly lacks support in recognized historiography. I have warned this user multiple times via private messages. An hour ago, I wrote to him again, but only thirty minutes later, he proceeded to post another article as if nothing had happened. I strongly suspect that he is acting out of spite and deliberately disregarding.. Онеми (talk) 12:09, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, HorseBro the hemionus here. I do base my articles of off reliable sources, Such as Moiseev, 1991, Erofeeva, 2007, Adle, 2003 and more. These articles are based off of descriptions from other articles and similar. Such as to Austro-Turkish War (1788–1791) and Russo-Turkish War (1735–1739), which has no namings from any sources. And you are taking sources out of contexts, as Moiseev, 1991 and Kushkumbaev, 2003 mentions there were invasions and battles such as the Battle of the Ayagoz river. Also my Drafts do have reliable sources as well, as i removed former unreliable sources like Temigraliev and added better sources and citations. And you did not message me on Telegram nor Discord. - The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 12:31, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Онеми, in the future, do not give warnings privately, give them in public. Actions such as sanctions are usually only taken if someone is openly warned beforehand. HorseBro the hemionus, you know perfectly well that your understanding of sourcing, whether that regards copyright or notability, has been seriously flawed. I will give you the same advice I gave to one of your former collaborators—cease your WP:OWNERSHIP of topics and articles, and accept guidance from those warning you. If you do not, your path only leads one way—to blocks. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:44, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Understood.- The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 12:45, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Clearly your definition of “Understood” is different than mine HorseBro the hemionus; mine would have involved not immediately creating another half-arsed article. Do I really have to do another source assessment, or will you take the hint? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:15, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes i realize that my "understood" statement is didn't change anything and i will pause creating articles and move my recent ones as a draft. So i can redo my citations and sourcing.- The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 14:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello again, @AirshipJungleman29. I honestly can't deal with him anymore; his unblocking has led to nothing good. He continues to publish articles based on his own ideas without any substantiation. Recently, I lost my device and have now created a new Wikipedia account from a different one, which is why I am writing from this new profile. Because of this, I lost all my books, and as a result, I cannot confidently continue my activities on Wikipedia. Hors has once again released his fictional wars: 1635–1658, 1681–1686, 1698–1703, and 1731–1735. I am at my wits' end—moreover, in the article regarding 1681–1686, he removed my sourced text as if it were nothing and claimed there was no source. Do I really need to cite the exact same source and page for every single sentence in a paragraph? I state plainly: this user's contribution is destructive and falsified; it even goes as far as him uploading modern images without knowing whether they are subject to copyright or not. A major problem is that he writes about these "victories" for "cool videos" where people set Dzungar warriors or khans to cool/beautiful music, showcasing Dzungar wars, campaigns, and battles as victories over other nations, thereby spreading lies. I have nothing against such videos as an idea, but they present falsifications. Separately, I’ll give a literal example regarding his claim that there are no sources indicating dates. His examples: "Austro-Turkish War (1788–1791)" - I am not an expert in the history of Turkey and Austria, but I have already found a source (2-3) where the years of the war are specified. A second example according to his logic: "Russo-Turkish War (1735–1739)" - and here, too, I found a source immediately. I don't know what to do.. Лунный Онеми (talk) 19:51, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

He literally reverted my edit in his article about the 1635–1658 war without any justification. He cites Atygaev on page 138, but I am quoting what is actually written there: «Б.П. Гуревич писал, что при Сенге в результате побед казахов вос-точная часть Жетысу фактически была освобождена от джунгар635, однако источники не подтверждают этого мнения. Из биографии Зая-Пандиты следует, что в 60-е гг. территория от Аягуза до Тала-са полностью находилась под контролем Джунгарского ханства. В частности, в междуречье рек Чу и Талас в эти годы находились кочевья Галдамбы, в районе р. Талгар была ставка Очирту-Цэ-цэн-тайши, Аюка и Цаган зимовали у Коксу и Каратала, севернее у р. Аягуз находились владения Аблай-тайши636.». It literally states that primary sources differ in opinion, yet he reverted the edit and wrote it in a way that suits his narrative. Furthermore, I provided him with a source regarding the 1652–1655 war, where historians hold the exclusive opinion that the Kazakhs won in 1655, and that is it-no further military actions were recorded. I state once again: this editor is acting in bad faith. Лунный Онеми (talk) 20:00, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

That was unfinished with "Dispute" not as Disputed or with any {{Efn}} template or make a consensus on the Talk Page (WP:Consensus), that was not random and you can add the 1652–1655 part, as it could increase the coverage of the page. — The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 20:10, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

What fictional wars? They are correctly cited and supported with the right materials, i have even shown most of it off-wiki via Telegram. The namings also meet WP:Precision and WP:Consistency. Your edit on the 1681–1686 was disruptive (WP:Disruptive) and you did not fully write the results and most of it had grammar issues. These are not "Destructive" and certainly not for "cool videos". Also then same thing applies for other similar articles such as Kazakh–Uzbek War or Kazakh–Nogai War which are inadequately sourced. — The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 20:07, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Sad to hear you lost access to your account Лунный Онеми; I've put a userbox on your userpage per WP:ALTNOTIFY so everyone is clear on that point. I've started looking at the Horsebro account's edits, and yes, most of them are pretty substandard. Source misrepresentation, WP:SYNTH, the lot.

It took me a good amount of time to do the source analysis for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazakh–Dzungar War (1731–1735); I'll likely have to do similar for the others in Template:Campaignbox Kazakh–Dzungar Wars. Dull, dreary work which makes editing a chore. Rosguill, at this point the WP:ROPE you gave them by unblocking is starting to wind its way around other editors' necks. See also this discussion. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:24, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

The two comments above on this page do give some immediate cause for concern. HorseBro the hemionus, do you have an explanation for why you created Kazakh–Dzungar War (1698–1703)? Can you identify issue that AirshipJungleman29 has highlighted in your editing, and explain how you are going to avoid repeating this error? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:24, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

WP:SYNTH, not enough coverage of the pages and I will start a consensus on the related page, wherger to create the pages. If agreed, will create the draftpages, and before submitting i would ask suggestions and feedback for improvement. (Whn creating pages) and about Pre-existing pages, i will make a galk page consensus for improvement or to draft the page as most of the articles i created, andedit them from suggestions or from help from Teahouse— The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

GA initiatives page

Hello, AirshipJungleman29! Just to let you know, I linked to your nice page Wikipedia:Good article initiatives from the GA header (Note that "Reviewing initiatives:" didn't used to have any link). Thank you, from the reviewing community! Prhartcom (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Quick follow-up

I see you are back from your break. I hope you had a nice time! When you have a chance, could you finish the review of the Crusading movement? Borsoka (talk) 10:24, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

I will endeavour to do so forthwith Borsoka; my apologies for the delay. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:54, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

TFA

story · music · places

Thank you today for Shigi Qutuqu, introduced (in 2024): "Compared to his contemporaries in the early Mongol Empire, Shigi Qutuqu stands out perhaps most for his lack of military ability—he was in command during the most serious reverse of the early Mongol conquests. Nevertheless, he had a long and productive career, serving in numerous judicial and administrative roles in China and surviving the power struggles of the 1240s and 50s until his death at 80+." -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:50, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Help needed.

Hello, you had recently moved a page, Kazakh–Dzungar War (1681–1686) as a redirect to Kazakh–Dzungar Wars and now, I have found a source that now puts the actual date from 1681 to 1684, hence as i moved the page Kazakh–Dzungar War (1698–1703) to Kazakh–Dzungar War (1681–1684) out of boldness and not even a WP:SYNTH. Now I need the source code of the former page to add to it. — The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 10:21, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

What??? You hijacked another article instead of just creating a new one?? Why do you persist in making life harder for everyone else HorseBro the hemionus? Do you not understand the purpose of article history?? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:26, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Nope, I have actually a decent source to make it a notable article, as for your reason for the redirect. Also stop trying to bite me, it's getting annoying. — The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 10:29, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Removing a deletion notice from an article with no good reason is disruptive editing. So is hijacking a page about a separate topic. You now have 2,000 edits; WP:BITE does not really apply. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:34, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Not an Hijack, as the relevant content of the page is moved to the aftermath section, not as a completely random page. I also tried to assume Good faith by assuming boldness and finding the page's source to cite it. Not going to further cause any more problems here. — The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 10:42, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Persnickety note

Hi, thanks for the note on ANI, just wanted to let you know that while you mentioned the 3O manipulation, the comment you linked to is about the pattern of reverting together. This is the comment with the 3O evidence. Samuelshraga (talk) 12:56, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Wei Shujun

On 6 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wei Shujun, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the films of Wei Shujun often meditate on the process of making films for the Chinese cinema industry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wei Shujun. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wei Shujun), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Happy to see you back

Good job with Antigoneia so far, made me happy to see another GAN from you. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks muchly Generalissima; been a long winter but want to get back into the swing of things. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:29, 6 March 2026 (UTC)