Talk:Rosebery School for Girls: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WPSchools}}, {{WikiProject Surrey}}, {{WikiProject United Kingdom}}. Tag: |
→Rename to Rosebery School: new section |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{WikiProject United Kingdom |importance=Low |image-needed=yes}} |
{{WikiProject United Kingdom |importance=Low |image-needed=yes}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Rename to Rosebery School == |
|||
I think that this article should be renamed to Rosebery School, It has never been called anything else as far as I can tell [https://reports.ofsted.gov.uk/provider/23/137736], even the previous non-academy incarnation did not have a "for girls" suffix, is there a specific reason the article has been called this? [[User:Diacius|Diacius]] ([[User talk:Diacius|talk]]) 08:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:42, 3 May 2024
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rename to Rosebery School
I think that this article should be renamed to Rosebery School, It has never been called anything else as far as I can tell [1], even the previous non-academy incarnation did not have a "for girls" suffix, is there a specific reason the article has been called this? Diacius (talk) 08:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Low-importance school articles
- Start-Class Surrey-related articles
- Low-importance Surrey-related articles
- Start-Class Surrey-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Surrey articles
- Start-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in the United Kingdom
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles