User:Omar Magdy Rashwan/Al-Fattah al-Aleem Mosque/Yiayi Peer Review: Difference between revisions
Peer review |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The article contains a header, sub headings and paragraphs and is overall structured well, the article is divided into sections that convey information about the building well. The article is generally well-structured, with clear sections detailing different aspects of the mosque, including its architecture, entrances, domes, minarets, and contractors. However, consider organizing the information into more distinct subsections for easier readability.The article provides detailed descriptions of the mosque's features, including its entrances, domes, and minarets. However, ensure that the descriptions are concise and avoid unnecessary repetition. More images of the mosques interior and location would be beneficial for |
The article contains a header, sub headings and paragraphs and is overall structured well, the article is divided into sections that convey information about the building well. The article is generally well-structured, with clear sections detailing different aspects of the mosque, including its architecture, entrances, domes, minarets, and contractors. However, consider organizing the information into more distinct subsections for easier readability. The article provides detailed descriptions of the mosque's features, including its entrances, domes, and minarets. However, ensure that the descriptions are concise and avoid unnecessary repetition. More images of the mosques interior and location would be beneficial for the readers interpretation. |
||
Additionally, more information about each part of the mosque could be added, some descriptions are lacking detail. |
|||
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org peer review/guide}} |
|||
==General info== |
==General info== |
Latest revision as of 12:41, 5 May 2024
The article contains a header, sub headings and paragraphs and is overall structured well, the article is divided into sections that convey information about the building well. The article is generally well-structured, with clear sections detailing different aspects of the mosque, including its architecture, entrances, domes, minarets, and contractors. However, consider organizing the information into more distinct subsections for easier readability. The article provides detailed descriptions of the mosque's features, including its entrances, domes, and minarets. However, ensure that the descriptions are concise and avoid unnecessary repetition. More images of the mosques interior and location would be beneficial for the readers interpretation.
Additionally, more information about each part of the mosque could be added, some descriptions are lacking detail.
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info[edit]
- Whose work are you reviewing?
(provide username)
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Evaluate the drafted changes[edit]
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)