Talk:Interstate 85 in North Carolina/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: Reply |
→GA Review: i like this template better |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Thank you. I will try and add any comments that I have if possible. [[User:NoobThreePointOh|NoobThreePointOh]] ([[User talk:NoobThreePointOh|talk]]) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
:Thank you. I will try and add any comments that I have if possible. [[User:NoobThreePointOh|NoobThreePointOh]] ([[User talk:NoobThreePointOh|talk]]) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
{| class="wikitable" style=" |
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left" |
||
| ⚫ | |||
|- |
|||
! width="30" | Rate <!-- Replace the question marks below with "y", "n", or nothing to change the assessment icon --> |
|||
! height=50 | [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review<br>{{small|(see [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|here]] for what the criteria are, and [[WP:GACN|here]] for what they are not)}} |
|||
! width="300"| [[WP:Good article criteria|Attribute]] |
|||
|- |
|||
! | Review Comment |
|||
| |
|||
|- style="vertical-align:top;" |
|||
#It is '''reasonably well written'''. |
|||
| colspan="3" | '''1.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}: <!-- Well written. Add comments to the ends of the lines below. --> |
|||
#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|}}<br/> b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|}} |
|||
<!-- The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct. --> |
|||
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]''', as shown by a [[WP:GAN/I#R3|source spot-check]]. |
|||
{{GATable/item|1a|| |
|||
#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|}} |
|||
}} |
|||
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''. |
|||
<!-- it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. --> |
|||
#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|}} |
|||
{{GATable/item|1b|| |
|||
#It follows the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''. |
|||
}} |
|||
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|}} |
|||
|- style="vertical-align:top;" |
|||
#It is '''stable'''. |
|||
| colspan="3" | '''2.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}, as shown by a [[WP:GAN/I#R3|source spot-check]]: <!-- Verifiable. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). --> |
|||
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|}} |
|||
<!-- It provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout. --> |
|||
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''', where possible and appropriate. |
|||
{{GATable/item|2a|| |
|||
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Non-free_use_rationale_guideline|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>b ''(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|}} |
|||
}} |
|||
|- |
|||
<!-- All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines. --> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{GATable/item|2b|| |
|||
'''Overall''':<br/> |
|||
}} |
|||
''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|}}<!-- Template:GAReview --> |
|||
<!-- It contains no original research. --> |
|||
|- |
|||
{{GATable/item|2c|| |
|||
|- |
|||
}} |
|||
! height=30|[[File:Symbol_support_vote.svg|15px]] · [[File:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg|15px]] · [[File:Symbol_wait.svg|15px]] · [[File:Symbol_neutral_vote.svg|15px]] |
|||
<!-- It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. --> |
|||
|- |
|||
{{GATable/item|2d|| |
|||
}} |
|||
|- style="vertical-align:top;" |
|||
| colspan="3" | '''3.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}: <!-- Broad. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). --> |
|||
<!-- Coverage. It addresses the [[Wikipedia:Out of scope|main aspects of the topic]]. --> |
|||
{{GATable/item|3a|| |
|||
}} |
|||
<!-- Focus. It stays [[Wikipedia:Article size|focused on the topic]] without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). --> |
|||
{{GATable/item|3b|| |
|||
}} |
|||
<!-- Neutral. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). --> |
|||
{{GATable/item|4|| |
|||
}} |
|||
<!-- Stable. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). --> |
|||
{{GATable/item|5|| |
|||
}} |
|||
|- style="vertical-align:top;" |
|||
| colspan="3" | '''6.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: <!-- Images. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). --> |
|||
<!-- Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content. --> |
|||
{{GATable/item|6a|| |
|||
}} |
|||
<!-- Images are [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Pertinence and encyclopedic nature|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[Wikipedia:CAP|suitable captions]]. --> |
|||
{{GATable/item|6b|| |
|||
}} |
|||
<!-- Overall. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). --> |
|||
{{GATable/item|7|<!-- Replace this comment with your final assessment: "y" or "n" -->| |
|||
}} |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
Revision as of 23:15, 9 May 2024
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: NoobThreePointOh (talk · contribs) 01:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Keresluna (talk · contribs) 18:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
I will take on this review. Keres🌕Luna edits! 18:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will try and add any comments that I have if possible. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | |
|
|
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
|
|
7. Overall assessment. | |