Jump to content

User talk:Sunrise: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Tag: Reverted
Line 52: Line 52:


Re [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terminology_of_alternative_medicine&oldid=894510465 this edit summary]. You'll be pleased to know that I (not a bot), have just [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terminology_of_alternative_medicine&diff=1223177701&oldid=1223176740 found the last one]. Sorry it took me five years. [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 11:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Re [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terminology_of_alternative_medicine&oldid=894510465 this edit summary]. You'll be pleased to know that I (not a bot), have just [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terminology_of_alternative_medicine&diff=1223177701&oldid=1223176740 found the last one]. Sorry it took me five years. [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 11:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

:I remember this - I see that when I went back to fill in the missing refs, I didn't bring over the targets of the short citations as well. Thanks for cleaning up after my mistake. :-)

:At the time, I was under the impression that when copying between articles, if there were named references that weren't defined in the copied content, then you could leave them undefined as long as you linked the original article in the edit summary. I thought that a bot would later come by and check the linked article to fill in the missing ref. As you can see, it didn't happen and I ended up doing it manually. Would you happen to know anything about this? I never saw it happen afterwards, so I don't know where I got the idea from. Maybe I'm just a hallucinating AI language model... [[User:Sunrise|''<b style="color:#F60;font-family:Times New Roman">Sunrise</b>'']] <i style="font-size:11px">([[User talk:Sunrise|talk]])</i> 14:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:38, 10 May 2024

Please feel free to contact me here (or ping me) at any time. In fact, it's often the best way to get my attention; due to my time constraints, I try to minimize the size of my watchlist and clean it out semi-regularly. For the same reason, I may also edit without checking my watchlist, defer my responses on talk pages, silently leave a discussion, etc.

You can leave a new message by using the "New Section" button in the top right of the page. Please remember to sign your comment with four tildes (~~~~).

I keep a large offline database of sources and quotes for articles I work on, far more than any one person could use, so you're welcome to ask me about them if we’re working in the same topic areas. I may also have already added pre-formatted citations on-wiki, e.g. here, although these may not be fully updated.

Wikiphilosophy
  • BRD: edit freely, and don’t take reverts personally.
  • AAGF: the more you truly understand WP:AGF, the less often you should feel a desire to cite it.
  • CONCEDE: your time and energy is limited; if it is not spent most productively on the current discussion, then live and let live.
  • NORUSH: if you're right, consensus will eventually get there; if you're wrong, consensus shouldn't get there.
  • PRINCIPLE: follow the spirit of the rules, even if you dislike the outcome, so that others will do the same for you.


Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing refs to be filled by bot

Re this edit summary. You'll be pleased to know that I (not a bot), have just found the last one. Sorry it took me five years. DuncanHill (talk) 11:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I remember this - I see that when I went back to fill in the missing refs, I didn't bring over the targets of the short citations as well. Thanks for cleaning up after my mistake. :-)
At the time, I was under the impression that when copying between articles, if there were named references that weren't defined in the copied content, then you could leave them undefined as long as you linked the original article in the edit summary. I thought that a bot would later come by and check the linked article to fill in the missing ref. As you can see, it didn't happen and I ended up doing it manually. Would you happen to know anything about this? I never saw it happen afterwards, so I don't know where I got the idea from. Maybe I'm just a hallucinating AI language model... Sunrise (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]