Talk:Sad Machine: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
ChristieBot (talk | contribs) m Transcluding GA review |
Skyshifter (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|18:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)|nominator=<span style="border:1px solid #6E41B5;padding:2px">[[User:Skyshifter|<span style="color:#6E41B5;">Skyshifter</span>]]</span><span style="background:#6E41B5;border:1px solid #6E41B5;padding:2px">[[User talk:Skyshifter|<span style="color:white"><small>talk</small></span>]]</span>|page= |
{{GA nominee|18:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)|nominator=<span style="border:1px solid #6E41B5;padding:2px">[[User:Skyshifter|<span style="color:#6E41B5;">Skyshifter</span>]]</span><span style="background:#6E41B5;border:1px solid #6E41B5;padding:2px">[[User talk:Skyshifter|<span style="color:white"><small>talk</small></span>]]</span>|page=2|subtopic=Songs|status=|note=|shortdesc=}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| |
||
{{WikiProject Songs}} |
{{WikiProject Songs}} |
Revision as of 00:43, 12 May 2024
Sad Machine is currently a Songs good article nominee. Nominated by Skyshiftertalk at 18:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Sad Machine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 18:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: MFTP Dan (talk · contribs) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Dibs. After I finish my FAC that you've commented on, I'll review this. I love this song.
- @MFTP Dan: Thank you for considering reviewing this article! However, reviews usually should be completed in seven days, as stated by WP:GAN/I#R2: "Once you start a review, you are committing to complete it in a timely manner [...] plan to wrap up your review in about seven days." I understand you like the song, but if you plan to review it only after the FAC (which may take a month of more), the best course of action would be to start the review only after the FAC, if no one takes it in the meantime That way, I'd like to ask you if you are interested in reviewing this article while the FAC is running or if you would like to withdraw the review for now, starting again after the FAC if no one takes it in the meantime. Skyshiftertalk 23:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, I apologize, I wasn't aware of that caveat. Something must have changed in the review instructions that I didn't know about. If that's what you'd wish, I will throw it back in the pool until I'm done. mftp dan oops 23:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I believe this would be the best option. In that case, I've made a change to the GA nominee template so it is now back to the GAN list. Skyshiftertalk 00:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC)