Jump to content

Talk:Skirmish at Grass Valley: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tablelegs6 (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
 
Line 5: Line 5:
:You don't get to make up your own battle names. This might be better summarized in the main unit article if no RS actually use this name. [[User:Intothatdarkness|Intothat]][[User_talk:Intothatdarkness|darkness]] 13:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
:You don't get to make up your own battle names. This might be better summarized in the main unit article if no RS actually use this name. [[User:Intothatdarkness|Intothat]][[User_talk:Intothatdarkness|darkness]] 13:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
::it was described as a short “skirmish“ in the records. [[User:Tablelegs6|Tablelegs6]] ([[User talk:Tablelegs6|talk]]) 14:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
::it was described as a short “skirmish“ in the records. [[User:Tablelegs6|Tablelegs6]] ([[User talk:Tablelegs6|talk]]) 14:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
:::The records are a primary, not a secondary, source. Wikipedia relies on reliable secondary sources for most of its information. And honestly a lot of this stuff could be easily added to the unit's article since I really doubt that it's notable under Wikipedia guidelines. [[User:Intothatdarkness|Intothat]][[User_talk:Intothatdarkness|darkness]] 16:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:13, 18 May 2024

There was no no name for this battle I just told him but I think it would be called

[edit]

Not a lot of documented engagements given to the first California Calvary but in the written documents we see about a skirmish that happened in Green Valley Inside California Tablelegs6 (talk) 01:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't get to make up your own battle names. This might be better summarized in the main unit article if no RS actually use this name. Intothatdarkness 13:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
it was described as a short “skirmish“ in the records. Tablelegs6 (talk) 14:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The records are a primary, not a secondary, source. Wikipedia relies on reliable secondary sources for most of its information. And honestly a lot of this stuff could be easily added to the unit's article since I really doubt that it's notable under Wikipedia guidelines. Intothatdarkness 16:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]