Talk:Haunted (Taylor Swift song)/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: Reply |
Brachy0008 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Not so much comments yet (due to my shitty iPad external keyboard not working, so i has to resort to the digital and more shittier one), however a first look into the article, it seems a bit incomplete (probably bc of the personnel section leaving it ''haunted''). |
Not so much comments yet (due to my shitty iPad external keyboard not working, so i has to resort to the digital and more shittier one), however a first look into the article, it seems a bit incomplete (probably bc of the personnel section leaving it ''haunted''). |
||
===Sources...?=== |
|||
====Background and writing==== |
|||
* FN 2: Not really sure how you got {{Tq|She conceived the album as a collection of songs about the things she had wanted to but was unable to do with the people she had met in real life}} from FN 2 (maybe bc of heavy paraphrasing, so I would like a bit of quotation). |
|||
===Copyvios=== |
|||
* Checked with Earwig's. Copyvios unlikely (10.7%) |
|||
Revision as of 02:30, 29 May 2024
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Gained (talk · contribs) 11:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 06:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Brachy0008! The reason that there is no "Personnel" section for the original song is because there's actually no info on them. The liner notes of the album dosen't have credits at all, just the prologue and the songs. Gained (talk) 06:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- understandable. however, some other Speak Now articles were able to milk personnel information from tidal. also, isn’t haunted a promotional single? Brachy08 (Talk) 07:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I personally don't think Tidal is a good source for personnels as per WP:AFFILIATE, and I can't access it anyway. And no, "Haunted" is not a promotional single; the acoustic version is. Gained (talk) 08:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I mean... songs like mine are walking around wikipedia as GAs with tidal-supported personnel sections Brachy08 (Talk) 09:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well... Tidal has been one of the standard source for personnels for years, but I still find it sketchy as Swift nor Big Machine never released the official credits. Gained (talk) 09:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Brachy0008: How's it going, buddy? Gained (talk) 05:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- oh... ur i forgot it existed, sorry. will get to it as soon as possible Brachy08 (Talk) 10:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just take your time bro. Gained (talk) 12:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- oh... ur i forgot it existed, sorry. will get to it as soon as possible Brachy08 (Talk) 10:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Brachy0008: How's it going, buddy? Gained (talk) 05:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well... Tidal has been one of the standard source for personnels for years, but I still find it sketchy as Swift nor Big Machine never released the official credits. Gained (talk) 09:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I mean... songs like mine are walking around wikipedia as GAs with tidal-supported personnel sections Brachy08 (Talk) 09:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I personally don't think Tidal is a good source for personnels as per WP:AFFILIATE, and I can't access it anyway. And no, "Haunted" is not a promotional single; the acoustic version is. Gained (talk) 08:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- understandable. however, some other Speak Now articles were able to milk personnel information from tidal. also, isn’t haunted a promotional single? Brachy08 (Talk) 07:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
It's me! Hi! I'm the reviewer, it's me. Don't mind me, just reviewing an article I created (and was later stolen) about yet another Taylor Swift song =D.
Not so much comments yet (due to my shitty iPad external keyboard not working, so i has to resort to the digital and more shittier one), however a first look into the article, it seems a bit incomplete (probably bc of the personnel section leaving it haunted).
Sources...?
Background and writing
- FN 2: Not really sure how you got
She conceived the album as a collection of songs about the things she had wanted to but was unable to do with the people she had met in real life
from FN 2 (maybe bc of heavy paraphrasing, so I would like a bit of quotation).
Copyvios
- Checked with Earwig's. Copyvios unlikely (10.7%)