Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockoons: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:13, 7 June 2024

Rockoons

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; all coverage both in article and in BEFORE search provides only WP:TRIVIALMENTION. WP:TVSERIES does not apply in the absence of reliable sourcing about its production. As an alternative to deletion, I propose to redirect to Soyuzmultfilm. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and Russia. Owen× ☎ 22:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I don't see how this fails notability. There are sources in the article. I must also add that the addition of the deletion tag seems premature as it was added only 9 minutes after the addition of those calling for the improvement of the article. Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 01:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added them as part of new page review, which was when I did source analysis and decided they did not meet WP:GNG. Did you look at the (two) sources? They each have a single passing mention of the show, nothing close to WP:SIGCOV. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're saying that the sources should only write about the show? At least they say something like the show is one of the selected ones in the country aimed for more international exposure. Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 06:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge to Soyuzmultfilm. Article certainly does fail SIGCOV. It's all unsourced fancruft with both citations barely mentioning the subject in passing, as stated by the nom. The show has been around three years yet a Gsearch mainly turns up this while content for the show consists of YouTube clips. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 07:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 :I added them as part of new page review, which was when I did source analysis and decided they did not meet [[WP:GNG]]. Did you look at the (two) sources? They each have a single passing mention of the show, nothing close to [[WP:SIGCOV]]. [[User:Dclemens1971|Dclemens1971]] ([[User talk:Dclemens1971|talk]]) 02:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 ::You're saying that the sources should only write about the show? At least they say something like the show is one of the selected ones in the country aimed for more international exposure. [[User:Red White Blue and Yellow|Red White Blue and Yellow]] ([[User talk:Red White Blue and Yellow|talk]]) 06:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' or merge to [[Soyuzmultfilm]]. Article certainly does fail SIGCOV. It's all unsourced fancruft with both citations barely mentioning the subject in passing, as mentioned by the nom. The show has been around three years yet a Gsearch mainly turns up [[Rockoon|this]] while content for the show consists of YouTube clips. [[User:HopalongCasualty|<b style="color:darkred; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">💥<i>Casualty</i></b>]] [[User talk:HopalongCasualty|<small><span style='color:black;text-shadow:0.2em 0.2em 0.5em black'><sup>'''• Hop along. •'''</sup></span></small>]] 07:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' or merge to [[Soyuzmultfilm]]. Article certainly does fail SIGCOV. It's all unsourced fancruft with both citations barely mentioning the subject in passing, as stated by the nom. The show has been around three years yet a Gsearch mainly turns up [[Rockoon|this]] while content for the show consists of YouTube clips. [[User:HopalongCasualty|<b style="color:darkred; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">💥<i>Casualty</i></b>]] [[User talk:HopalongCasualty|<small><span style='color:black;text-shadow:0.2em 0.2em 0.5em black'><sup>'''• Hop along. •'''</sup></span></small>]] 07:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)