Talk:Democratic Kampuchea: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:42, 10 June 2024

Socialism High‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia Top‑importance

Democratic Kampuchea is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Military history: National / Asian / Southeast Asia Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 7, 2005 and January 7, 2006.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Old comment

This article has no mention of US, Thai and UN support to the Khmer Rouge against the Vietnamese-sponsored Cambodian government after the Khmer Rouge had been driven from power - this is both a serious gap in the history of Cambodia and also a serious NPOV problem. Given that the content in the article is taken from the Library of Congress Country Studies an omission of American assistance to the Khmer Rouge is perfectly understandable, nonetheless to maintain NPOV this needs to be radically revised. --Ce garcon 07:41, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I moved this comment here from Wikipedia:Pages needing attention/Politics. I'm leaving it up to more knowledgeable editors to figure out if it is a legitimate point that requires addressing in this or some other article. -- Beland (talk) 03:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Emblem of Democratic Kampuchea (1975–1979).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Roundel of Cambodia (1976–1979).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss the Subject, Not the Source

I am removing the italicised sentence under WP:BOLD (italics added): After establishing the historical and ideological context as the backdrop, Hinton delves deeper into the complexities of perpetrator motivation through using both macro- and micro-level analyses to uncover how ideology is linked to psychocultural processes. Under the Khmer Rouge, the encroachment of the public sphere into that which was once private space made constant group-level interactions. Within these spaces, cultural models such as face, shame, and honour were adapted to Khmer Rouge notions of social status and bound up with revolutionary consciousness. The italicised sentence does not actually deal with the subject of the article, Democratic Kampuchea, but with how the RS evaluated the subject. I cannot find a specific WP policy that addresses this situation, but I do not feel it is encyclopaedic wording. I am absolutely willing to be overruled on that belief, but please discuss it here before reverting. If you feel the sentence is critical to understanding Democratic Kampuchea, please explain why and (preferably) propose wording that would move the focus to the subject itself. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 * [[commons:File:Roundel of Cambodia (1976–1979).svg|Roundel of Cambodia (1976–1979).svg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2023-05-08T13:54:30.115950 | Roundel of Cambodia (1976–1979).svg -->
 Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roundel of Cambodia (1976–1979).svg|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 13:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
+== Discuss the Subject, Not the Source ==
+I am removing the italicised sentence under [[WP:BOLD]] (italics added): {{tq|''After establishing the historical and ideological context as the backdrop, Hinton delves deeper into the complexities of perpetrator motivation through using both macro- and micro-level analyses to uncover how ideology is linked to psychocultural processes.'' Under the Khmer Rouge, the encroachment of the public sphere into that which was once private space made constant group-level interactions. Within these spaces, cultural models such as face, shame, and honour were adapted to Khmer Rouge notions of social status and bound up with revolutionary consciousness.}} The italicised sentence does not actually deal with the ''subject'' of the article, Democratic Kampuchea, but with how the RS ''evaluated'' the subject. I cannot find a specific WP policy that addresses this situation, but I do not feel it is encyclopaedic wording. '''I am absolutely willing to be overruled''' on that belief, but please discuss it here before reverting. If you feel the sentence is critical to understanding Democratic Kampuchea, please explain why and (preferably) propose wording that would move the focus to the subject itself. Cheers, [[User:Last1in|Last1in]] ([[User talk:Last1in|talk]]) 14:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)