Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vandalism of Stonehenge: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Secretlondon (talk | contribs) →Vandalism of Stonehenge: delete |
Comment |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Comment''' the title is simply "Vandalism of Stonehenge" so this article could be used to cover ''all'' vandalism attempts on the monument. Otherwise '''Merge''' as above—<span style="background-color: #EAE6FF">[[User:Iadmc|<span style="color: #0247FE"> Iadmc</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Iadmc|<span style="color: black">♫</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Iadmc|<span style="color: #0247FE">talk </span>]]</sup></span> 11:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' the title is simply "Vandalism of Stonehenge" so this article could be used to cover ''all'' vandalism attempts on the monument. Otherwise '''Merge''' as above—<span style="background-color: #EAE6FF">[[User:Iadmc|<span style="color: #0247FE"> Iadmc</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Iadmc|<span style="color: black">♫</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Iadmc|<span style="color: #0247FE">talk </span>]]</sup></span> 11:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' just another stunt from them. No damage - not interesting. [[User:Secretlondon|Secretlondon]] ([[User talk:Secretlondon|talk]]) 12:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' just another stunt from them. No damage - not interesting. [[User:Secretlondon|Secretlondon]] ([[User talk:Secretlondon|talk]]) 12:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment from creator''' — I absolutely did '''not''' say the scope couldn’t be expanded. In fact, my [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vandalism_of_Stonehenge&diff=prev&oldid=1230026452 only comment] regarding notability of the article was to note that LASTING could not be proven, and that a reassessment should occur in a week for notability. I am not going to !vote here, however, {{u|GenevieveDEon}} put words into my mouth in this [[WP:RAPID]] deletion attempt. I personally ignore the nomination reasoning by GenevieveDEon For that reason, however, all other comments (keep, merge, or delete) from other editors I will be looking at extensively and appreciate all the responses. '''The [[User:WeatherWriter|Weather Event Writer]]''' ([[User talk:WeatherWriter|Talk Page)]] 12:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:10, 20 June 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vandalism of Stonehenge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This event is fully covered in a short paragraph in the main Stonehenge article. The idea that something which happened yesterday and was cleaned up today with no lasting effects needs a whole article with the sweeping title 'Vandalism of Stonehenge' is unreasonable. Attempts to query the notability of this article, or to expand its scope to match the title, have been rebuffed by the creator, which rather smacks of WP:OWN. GenevieveDEon (talk) 08:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Merge with Just_Stop_Oil#2024: Per OP. Not independently notable when this is one among many Just Stop Oil protests. — Czello (music) 09:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Merge whatever is salvageable to Just Stop Oil per OP. WP:NEVENT is relevant. Traumnovelle (talk) 09:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Merge where appropriate and delete. Given the tabby choice of title I'm agnostic if we need even the redirect. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 09:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Events, Environment, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Merge whatever is appropriate to Just Stop Oil. I was tempted to nominate it myself, but thought for some reason we should wait one week or so when coverage inevitably stops. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 10:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment the title is simply "Vandalism of Stonehenge" so this article could be used to cover all vandalism attempts on the monument. Otherwise Merge as above— Iadmc♫talk 11:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete just another stunt from them. No damage - not interesting. Secretlondon (talk) 12:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment from creator — I absolutely did not say the scope couldn’t be expanded. In fact, my only comment regarding notability of the article was to note that LASTING could not be proven, and that a reassessment should occur in a week for notability. I am not going to !vote here, however, GenevieveDEon put words into my mouth in this WP:RAPID deletion attempt. I personally ignore the nomination reasoning by GenevieveDEon For that reason, however, all other comments (keep, merge, or delete) from other editors I will be looking at extensively and appreciate all the responses. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 12:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)