Talk:Equivalent circuit model for Li-ion cells

Can it have a more specific title?

Overall well written article, with a lot of references! The only thing I felt was about the title. I expected it to be a general article about equivalent-circuit modelling in electronics, but it turned out to be specifically about Li-ion cells. Having "cell" or "li-ion" somewhere in the title could have helped, but I am not sure. A Google search yielded many fields with closely similar names. The article also links to the Equivalent circuit page at the end. Is this the scientific term used for this field? Shivaprsd (talk) 12:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Repeated citations

OK this is minor nitpicking, but in the section RC Parallels, all the three sentences of the paragraph cite the same reference. May be you need to cite only once at the end? Shivaprsd (talk) 13:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Well done, it very readable despite the technicalities

I enjoyed reading, also fixed a few typos. I would double to proposal of choosing a more specific title about battery modeling or make the article more general and less battery-oriented. Not sure about the formulas, but many concepts seem to be generally applicable to other electrical equivalency models.

It was a surprise to see this topic was missing or not separately described in wikipedia. 👍 LuKePicci (talk) 13:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Review n. 3

The article is well written. I know very little about batteries, however I was able to understand the topic since the author has a great capability of explaining in a simple way topics that I believe to be very technical. I fixed some minor typos, which are more than expected in such a long article. Good job!