Talk:Metaepistemology: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{Philosophy}}. Tag: |
Shapeyness (talk | contribs) Add possible refideas |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| talk = Talk:Epistemology/Archive 4#Merge with Meta-epistemology |
| talk = Talk:Epistemology/Archive 4#Merge with Meta-epistemology |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{refideas |
|||
|{{Cite book| publisher = Routledge| isbn = 978-0-415-96219-3| editor-last = Sven|editor-first=Bernecker|editor-last2= Pritchard|editor-first2=Duncan| title = The Routledge Companion to Epistemology|series=Routledge Philosophy Companions |chapter=Part X METAEPISTEMOLOGICAL ISSUES| date = 2010}} Might be useful for improving the Epistemological methodology section. |
|||
|{{Cite book| publisher = De Gruyter| isbn = 978-3-11-049676-5| editor-last = Grajner| editor-first = Martin| editor-last2 = Schmechtig| editor-first = Pedro| title = Epistemic Reasons, Norms and Goals| date = 2016}} |
|||
|{{Cite book |title=Normativity: Epistemic and Practical |date=2018 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-875870-9 |editor-last=McHugh |editor-first=Conor |editor-last2=Way |editor-first2=Jonathan |editor-last3=Whiting |editor-first3=Daniel}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== Jargon == |
== Jargon == |
||
Revision as of 10:00, 13 July 2024
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for merging with Epistemology on 20 July 2007. The result of the discussion was keep as separate articles. |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Jargon
Unfortunately the reality of the field is that the jargon heavy terminology is required to convey very specific ideas. This is not really something that can be changed without significantly decreasing the content of the article. DMelvinKaphan (talk) 03:18, 14 April 2011 (UTC)