User talk:Danedouard00: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Mountolive (talk | contribs) m →Bye |
Danedouard00 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
::I see more and more people quitting because of this, and, myself, I have also have had to take breaks (from #1 POV editor, which looks like he is going to come back, by the way...) |
::I see more and more people quitting because of this, and, myself, I have also have had to take breaks (from #1 POV editor, which looks like he is going to come back, by the way...) |
||
::However, these editors usually get out of the community sooner or later, for a number of reasons. My advice is please keep working, if only in other articles. People like you is needed. [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] | [[User talk:Mountolive|Talk]] 23:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
::However, these editors usually get out of the community sooner or later, for a number of reasons. My advice is please keep working, if only in other articles. People like you is needed. [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] | [[User talk:Mountolive|Talk]] 23:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::I came back for just a look and I'm glad I'm not around; my blood pressure would probably be a few points higher if I had stayed. I think the wikipedia project has reached its quality limits given the current framework. Perhaps one day I'll contribute under different circumstances. [[User:Danedouard00|Danedouard00]] 03:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:52, 3 May 2007
What bothers me about several Wiki editors (and by extension, articles) is their varying standards. several of them produce or defend various unsources statements that are laced with POV yet when they encounter a sourced statement that doesnt jive with their understanding/beliefs/agenda/values, they (move to) strike. These editors usually center around ethnic/nationalistic themes. Please examine yourselves and be consistent with your standards. danedouard00 01:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
For me: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_maintenance_templates
Bye
I'm quitting Wikipedia because of POV editors. Have a nice life.danedouard00 01:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Don't do it, Dan. Take a few days off, take the whole week off, but come back. You'll be alright. SamEV 10:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- You-know-who is the second worst editor I have ever met for one year (and there have been and continue to add quite a few, fortunately people who is terribly inteligent and cultivated keep adding as well). In some regards, he is the first (the other one did not hide comments, for example) and he keeps adding in his personal score.
- Wikipedia can be indeed a source of frustrations at times when you meet this kind of POV editors, and I understand if you want to quit: that means that you have a life and you don't want to waste your time with any given editor who thinks that yelling in capital letters is very smart.
- I see more and more people quitting because of this, and, myself, I have also have had to take breaks (from #1 POV editor, which looks like he is going to come back, by the way...)
- However, these editors usually get out of the community sooner or later, for a number of reasons. My advice is please keep working, if only in other articles. People like you is needed. Mountolive | Talk 23:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- I came back for just a look and I'm glad I'm not around; my blood pressure would probably be a few points higher if I had stayed. I think the wikipedia project has reached its quality limits given the current framework. Perhaps one day I'll contribute under different circumstances. Danedouard00 03:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)