Talk:Commodore 128

C128D release dates

I know the 128D was released in 1987 in the United States; I have the back issues of Run Magazine and Compute!'s Gazette that talked about the release. I believe I remember reading that the 128D didn't pass the FCC initially, so it was released earlier in Europe than it was in the United States.

Can anyone confirm the date of the 128D's European release? We need to note the discrepancy. I know that 1985 date isn't correct for the United States. In 1985 and 1986, all that existed in the States was the "flat" 128. --Dave Farquhar 13:08, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I just checked one of my Gazette issues, and by their report from some winterly trade show the D model was definitely released in Europe in '85. One of my childhood pals actually had one. I'll try to find the months of release for both models -- I guess it's somewhere in the pile of mags. --Wernher 22:18, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

C128 trivia

I wrote the original part of the C128 trivia section (now in parantheses). I couldn't remember the exact memory address so I left it unfilled. The later, more specific addition (which is not in parantheses) seems to be talking about the exact same thing, but I am not fully sure. Could anyone confirm this? --Anonymous

But notice: one example says: [Write] 0xFF (255) to memory address 0xD02F (53295)[.] [...] On the 64 this memory location would always contain the value 0xFF no matter what was written to it[.]
while the other one goes: [M]onitor the contents of memory address TBC1 (<decimal value>)  for a while. A real 64 used this address as the internal hardware register TBC2 (<decimal value>), whose contents changed hundreds of times per second.

In other words, the two methods given as examples are somewhat opposite of each other. I'll try to find the address you mention in the latter example, as I sit on piles of CBM docs. Some day (or night) I might just bump into it. --Wernher 04:25, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I am the "Anonymous" who wrote above. Thing is, I didn't remember the exact details about the way to distinguish the two computers, only that it involved writing something to a certain memory address and reading it back after a second or so. On a C64, you didn't get back what you wrote, but on a C128, you did. What you did get back on a C64 and why this was so had only become a blur. So it's entirely possible the second example is wrong. 85.76.152.179 20:23, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Well, I'd say there's a good chance you're on to something that really exists, as "my" example does not at all call for a long delay between the write and read (more than a couple of instruction cycles, that is). But I'll put "your" example in wkp source comments (thus hiding it from the displayed article text while still keeping it in there) until we or someone else find the pertinent memory address. --Wernher 22:18, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Other video processor: MOS 8568

I just opened up my C128D (according to circuit board: C128DCR). I can find the MOS 8566, but I cannot find the MOS 8563. It seems to be replaced by a MOS 8568, which is also shown on this page :

The MOS 8568 'VDC' or 'DVDC' outputs the 80 column digital RGBI modes of the 128. It was originally developed as an enhanced 'color 6845' for the CBM 900, Commodore's Zilog Z8001 machine. When its development was cancelled due to the purchase of Amiga Inc., the existing VDC design was integrated in the C128. However, two versions do exist: the MOS 8563 was used in the flat C128 and 'plastic C128D', the later MOS 8568 can be found in C128D-CR and the C128-CR prototypes.

I don't think I'd add it in the right way if I would try to do so, so can someone add it? --Gunix (altough not registered) 15:31, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the information; I didn't even know that chip existed! :-) I added it very discreetly, and also adjusted several other related pages accordingly. The 8568 should possibly get its own article, since due to its extra output signals it has a different pinout than its predecessor (this is mentioned in the source page you refer to---great reference to a lot of microchips; I hope the site's owner will allow the inclusion of his 8568 photo to the chips' forthcoming article). --Wernher 05:50, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

VIC-II in C128 mode

The VIC-II is available in native mode, isn't it? Mirror Vax 00:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Indeed. All the C128 users who had no RGBI monitor would be in a bad fix if not. :-)   Incidentally, a cool feature that not many users had the opportunity to check out was the dual display capability of the 128's native mode: simultanously using the 40-col and the 80-col display---e.g. for showing graphics on the former and text (menus, src code, or whatever) on the latter. --Wernher 04:30, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Depending or not depending on x ?

From the Trivia section: "The Commodore 128's BASIC V7 [...] could be crashed or cause the computer to reboot by executing PRINT""+-[x] (where x is any integer), depending on the number entered for x."

This might seem somewhat ambigous: "x is any integer" and, at the same time, the outcome of the direct program line is "depending on [...] x". Is the real meaning behind this confusing statement something like the following: some value(s) of x will make the machine crash (i.e., freeze/lock up) while some other value(s) will make it reboot? If so, it would also be nice to know of some "working" :-) example values to put in the article. --Wernher 17:19, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Bil Herd's comment

Tidied this up as a quote rather than a comment directly from the man himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.24.80.93 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Numeric Keypad

The main article would be improved if an inaccuracy were corrected. It implies that an unnamed suite of business software would not work because it couldn't find the numeric keypad. I don't remember if Commodore Business Machines actually offered its own "suite" of business software (CBM generally didn't offer very good software but relied on independent programmers to do that sort of thing for them, usually outshining the giant by miles) but there is a numeric keypad. If you bother to take a look, you will see that the numeric keypad exists just right of the keyboard. (If I recall correctly, you can distinguish keypresses on the keypad from those on the regular keyboard by testing a new line of I/O that was fortuitously mapped to address one of the bits in address $01.)198.177.27.21 07:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)