Jump to content

Prout's hypothesis: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m clean up, Typos fixed: emition → emission, using AWB
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Prout's hypothesis''' was an early 19th century attempt to explain the existence of the various [[chemical element]]s through a hypothesis regarding the internal structure of the [[atom]]. In 1815 and 1816, the [[England|English]] chemist [[William Prout]] published two papers in which he observed that the [[atomic weight]]s that had been measured for the elements known at that time appeared to be [[integer]] multiples of the atomic weight of [[hydrogen]]. He then hypothesized that the hydrogen atom was the only truly fundamental object, and that the atoms of other elements were actually groupings of various numbers of hydrogen atoms.
'''Prout's hypothesis''' was an early 19th century attempt to explain the existence of the various [[chemical element]]s through a hypothesis regarding the internal structure of the [[atom]]. In 1815 and 1816, the [[England|English]] chemist [[William Prout]] published two papers in which he observed that the [[atomic weight]]s that had been measured for the elements known at that time appeared to be [[integer]] multiples of the atomic weight of [[hydrogen]]. He then hypothesized that the hydrogen atom was the only truly fundamental object, and that the atoms of other elements were actually groupings of various numbers of hydrogen atoms.


Prout's hypothesis remained influential in chemistry throughout the 1820s. However, more careful measurements of the atomic weights, such as those compiled by [[Jöns Jakob Berzelius]] in 1828 or [[Edward Turner]] in 1832, "disproved" the hypothesis. In particular the atomic weight of [[chlorine]], which is 35.45 times that of hydrogen, could not at the time be explained in terms of Prout's hypothesis. Some came up with the Ad Hoc claim that the basic unit was one-half of a hydrogen atom, but further discrepancies surfaced. This resulted in hypothesis that one-quarter of a hydrogen atom was the common unit. Although these turn out to be wrong, these conjectures catalyzed further measurement of atomic weights, a great benefit to chemistry.
Prout's hypothesis remained influential in chemistry throughout the 1820s. However, more careful measurements of the atomic weights, such as those compiled by [[Jöns Jakob Berzelius]] in 1828 or [[Edward Turner]] in 1832, "disproved" the hypothesis. In particular the atomic weight of [[chlorine]], which is 35.45 times that of [[hydrogen]], could not at the time be explained in terms of Prout's hypothesis. Some came up with the [[ad hoc]] claim that the basic unit was one-half of a hydrogen atom, but further discrepancies surfaced. This resulted in hypothesis that one-quarter of a hydrogen atom was the common unit. Although these turn out to be wrong, these conjectures catalyzed further measurement of atomic weights, a great benefit to chemistry.


The discrepancy in the [[atomic weight]]s was later understood to be the result of multiple [[isotope]]s of the same element. Although all elements are the product of [[nuclear fusion]] of hydrogen into higher elemets, it is now understood that atoms consist of both [[proton]]s (hydrogen nuclei) and [[neutron]]s. Protons in nuclei decay into neutrons by emission of [[beta radiation]].
The discrepancy in the [[atomic weight]]s was later understood to be the result of multiple [[isotope]]s of the same element. Although all elements are the product of [[nuclear fusion]] of hydrogen into higher elemets, it is now understood that atoms consist of both [[proton]]s (hydrogen nuclei) and [[neutron]]s. Protons in nuclei decay into neutrons by emission of [[beta radiation]].

Revision as of 18:30, 27 May 2007

Prout's hypothesis was an early 19th century attempt to explain the existence of the various chemical elements through a hypothesis regarding the internal structure of the atom. In 1815 and 1816, the English chemist William Prout published two papers in which he observed that the atomic weights that had been measured for the elements known at that time appeared to be integer multiples of the atomic weight of hydrogen. He then hypothesized that the hydrogen atom was the only truly fundamental object, and that the atoms of other elements were actually groupings of various numbers of hydrogen atoms.

Prout's hypothesis remained influential in chemistry throughout the 1820s. However, more careful measurements of the atomic weights, such as those compiled by Jöns Jakob Berzelius in 1828 or Edward Turner in 1832, "disproved" the hypothesis. In particular the atomic weight of chlorine, which is 35.45 times that of hydrogen, could not at the time be explained in terms of Prout's hypothesis. Some came up with the ad hoc claim that the basic unit was one-half of a hydrogen atom, but further discrepancies surfaced. This resulted in hypothesis that one-quarter of a hydrogen atom was the common unit. Although these turn out to be wrong, these conjectures catalyzed further measurement of atomic weights, a great benefit to chemistry.

The discrepancy in the atomic weights was later understood to be the result of multiple isotopes of the same element. Although all elements are the product of nuclear fusion of hydrogen into higher elemets, it is now understood that atoms consist of both protons (hydrogen nuclei) and neutrons. Protons in nuclei decay into neutrons by emission of beta radiation.

The modern version of Prout's rule is that the atomic mass of a nucleus of proton number P and neutron number N is equal to sum of the masses of its constituent protons and neutrons minus its binding energy.

References

  • William Prout (1815). On the relation between the specific gravities of bodies in their gaseous state and the weights of their atoms. Annals of Philosophy, 6: 321–330. Online reprint
  • William Prout (1816). Correction of a mistake in the essay on the relation between the specific gravities of bodies in their gaseous state and the weights of their atoms. Annals of Philosophy, 7: 111–13. Online reprint
  • The Semiempirical Formula for Atomic Masses