User talk:Wafulz

If you leave me a message here, I will respond here. If I have left you a message, I will respond on your talk page.

I request that Hibernian not be allowed to post on Technocracy related sites.

He has disregarded all attempts at compromise and logic. He continues to ruin by his edits the Technocratic movement material. He is linking over and over stuff that he wrote fromm his blog site TechCa. He has no regard for the page except as to his edits that are not done objectively. He wholesale reverts my edits. He puts up stuff that is totaly out of context to the page/pages.(skip sievert 21:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)) He also is resorting to defamation of character on the discussion page.(skip sievert 07:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC))

Sorry to bring this to your talk page again Wafulz, but... Skip, unfortunately it is you who are Uncompromising and Illogical, and also you who would ruin the article if left to run free. There's a very good reason why I am constantly reverting your edits, It's Baloney! Even after I made my arguments crystal clear on the talk page, you persist in making exactly the same bad edits and so, I must constantly revert it. Again as I thought I had made clear numerous times, I did not write any articles at Tech.ca, most of those links were written decades before I was even born! You accuse me of not being objective, anybody taking one look at your edits will see the utter Hypocrisy in that statement. If by "defamation of character" you mean stating the fact that you were expelled from Tech Inc. and are well known as a troll to everyone in the online community, then I stand by my statements. BTW two can play at the Banning game Skip, I'd ask that you be banned or blocked or whatever, but I'm pretty sure that's a lengthy and involved process, so I'm not sure if it would be worth it. Skip I've been contributing to the article for about a year now (don't know the exact time) and you come in do a load of crazy edits and then ask for me to be banned? Unbelievable!

Anyway Wafulz, if you can I'd like you to drop by the talk page again, and give your opinions on the various issues. --Hibernian 08:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

You are good at name calling Hibernian. That has little to do though with making accurate info. on this page. I would say you are the troll here. Yes Ross Murphy, or Hibernian you are the troll here. You have posted that type of troll stuff here and elsewhere on your blogging site. I have no reason to pick a fight. You have posted nasty stuff here. TechCA.(skip sievert 08:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC))

The links issue again

Wafulz can you please respond to my comments and questions about the links (and the article in general). I'm talking about Here (we need to get the links back pronto), and at the bottom of the page (about the citations). Also you may have to explain to Skip what in-line citations are, because he's now attempting to revert any sourcing I do. Thanks --Hibernian 03:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

The 'sourcing' you are doing is to a blogging site with 4 people that publish their own material.

My edit is basically the same as wafulz except for a sentence I changed to what I think is more objective. The 'citations' you are giving are pointless. There is a link to their site in my edit. Any more material than given by Wafulz edit is extraneous. I have made comments on the page in question discussion.(skip sievert 12:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC))

Kelvin Owusu Bossman

Writing 101-reader shouldn't have to go to outside sources to find out more about the subject. They should be in the article itself. 172.136.4.96 13:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Taken to afd Maybe you can add some info to the article from all those google hits. You made minor improvements to the article but haven't made inroads on WHY he is notable: Honors, awards, records, etc. Postcard Cathy 13:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Smithsonian

Thanks for the heads up. Why weren't they just changed to a "fairusein" tag. It makes no sense to delete them. How do I see the list? I always imagine that as soon as I stop editing Wikipedia, all my work will be deleted since no one will be there to police it. I always hate the "delete instead of fix" mentality. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 15:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Sidney Crosby

If we're not gonna recognize Brian Bellows' North Stars captaincy (because it was an interim-captaincy). Then all the -interim captains- should be removed from the 30 NHL team pages captains sections. We shouldn't have it both ways. GoodDay 16:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Or we could continue with the current process of marking them as "interim", which is a special designation distinct from an official non-temporary captain. I mean arguably Crosby was one of three interim captains last year when there were three A's but no C's.--Wafulz 16:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Bellows is mentioned (later) in the Crosby article, I can live with that. PS-The Penguins last season (2006-07) had 'only' alternate captains. This Crosby appointment has been difficult, I was rooting for Mark Recchi to get it (the Penguins captaincy). GoodDay 16:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Guriqbal Chahal

Hello,

Guriqbal Chahal was an article about an poet and brief review of his book. He is a good poet and I happen to know him and little bit about his poetic background. The article was a review of just that.

Please consider rolling back.

Thanks, San Sandhu

The article was written in a very promotional and unencyclopedic tone- recreating it would require a 100% rewrite to fit neutrality policies and the manual of style. You'd be better off starting over with a new article. --Wafulz 19:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Please delete this image

Please delete Image:Youtube screenshot profile.JPG. It was originally for a page that it got deleted from. So now it's just pointless. —Coastergeekperson04^{'s talk}@ 04:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

My changes are not staying

Hi,

There are numerous errors on the Dominik Hasek wikipedia page, I have tried changing them plenty of times and when I come back to the page later they have been removed. I have created an account, I have listed sources, nothing works. Half of the page is opinions about his style and how he plays--I am an expert and have watched him his entire career, yet I am not allowed to alter the opinions of others that are represented as fact? I feel you do this man a disservice by allowing misinformation about events in his life to be read as though fact due to some technicality...I don't know what else I can do since none of my edits work. You say that NPOV is the issue, the page as is is not neutral, it is biased and contains several insinuations!!! The sources for what is written are editorial hearsay and nothing else! And yet, I am not allowed to make changes...all I can do is throw up my arms and hope few people this garbage--there are things you insist on keeping on the page that would not be found in an encyclopedia.

Cody

It's not editorial hearsay- many other people who have watched him have also edited this article (about five or six consistently, I believe), and it has been through several thorough peer reviews. Anyway, your last batch of edits were reverted because they were copied almost verbatim from another website- we can't have copyright infringement on articles. --Wafulz 17:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

 Woo hoo! New to this.... apparently I got in a jam with copy and paste off a site. Reading would have helped there. Okay

then, type it out only to see it deleted the next day. Too funny. Have to read again regarding speedy deletion notices and here I thought I was doing the right thing by self correcting the matter. Silly me... more to catch up on and perhaps before I break a few more rules the IFC lawyers which handle copyright stuff are probably better suited for this. Sorry about that lads got ahead of myself.