Jump to content

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Big.P (2nd): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Big.P (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Big.P (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:


;Comments
;Comments
[[User:Filabusta|Filabusta]] is my brother, and we edit Wikipedia occasionally on the same internet connection. There's no sockpuppetry here. This is all a simple misunderstanding, blown out of proportion by a Wikipedian who has different interests than my brother and I regarding an article listed for deletion. -- <b>[[User:big.p|<font color="1e90ff">ßίζ<small>•</small>קּ‼</font>]]<font color="daa520"><small> ([[User talk:big.p|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/big.P|contribs]])</small></font></b> 06:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
[[User:Filabusta|Filabusta]] is my brother, and we edit Wikipedia occasionally on the same internet connection. There's no sockpuppetry here. This is all a simple misunderstanding, blown out of proportion by a Wikipedian who has different interests than my brother and I regarding an article listed for deletion. The past ought to remain in the past; digging it up and exploiting it does not reveal new truth, but rather, fuel controversy. -- <b>[[User:big.p|<font color="1e90ff">ßίζ<small>•</small>קּ‼</font>]]<font color="daa520"><small> ([[User talk:big.p|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/big.P|contribs]])</small></font></b> 06:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)





Revision as of 06:59, 6 June 2007

User:Big.P

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Big.P (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Filabusta (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)


Report submission by

-SpuriousQ (talk) 09:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence


Comments

Filabusta is my brother, and we edit Wikipedia occasionally on the same internet connection. There's no sockpuppetry here. This is all a simple misunderstanding, blown out of proportion by a Wikipedian who has different interests than my brother and I regarding an article listed for deletion. The past ought to remain in the past; digging it up and exploiting it does not reveal new truth, but rather, fuel controversy. -- ßίζקּ‼ (talk | contribs) 06:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Conclusions