Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 June 8

8 June 2007

Dynamic Submission

Dynamic Submission (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)

Not Spam, Not COI and no discussion, was done by a user that was upset because, I afd two of his article, this product is noteable, as defined by wiki Akc9000 13:44, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi-Zack (Mobile suit)

Hi-Zack (Mobile suit) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)

The Review that bared the article was a mass deletion where the result was decided because only the Wiki Project members wanted to keep and fix the articles. i find it very wrong that the votes of the project members were ignored because it send a message that some projects are not worth listening to i feel that references to something that may be obscure in the english speaking world deserve to be in the English wiki This info was not transwikied beyond the answers.com copy of the article i did every thing i could to cite the article and merged some of the other notable versions of the unit in to one Article. If given a chance and some time withe the project it would be up to standards. I demonstrated in the new opening how often this very model appers in the gundam universe. Jeffpiatt 03:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Sigh... see also this deletion review here. I don't exactly think this is the place to debate the AfD process. The "votes" of the members were not ignored, but keep in mind AfDs aren't votes. If I had a good reason for keeping the article but I was outnumbered by twenty to one "delete" votes with no rationale, I highly doubt that the article would get deleted. I looked at the differences and could see very little had changed about the article. David Fuchs ^{(talk / frog blast the vent core!)} 11:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Deletion discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSK-008 Dijeh. The article was recreated seven times at Hi-Zack (Mobile suit) and RMS-106 Hi-Zack, and only taken to DRV here after I placed both titles on the Protected Titles list yesterday after the repeated recreations of the deleted article, including the use of the multiple titles to get past the deletions. I'm not voting either way on this one, just adding info to the discussion. - TexasAndroid 11:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

but what i can't figure out is that even if i try to add how notable The Hi-Zack is the article is judged for the lower paragraphs i was trying to model the article after the one on the [Zaku II] and merge in the one shot ms that were told in storyline were decedents of the model in order to prove notabilty i need to use plot details but if i add too many it would be removed as have a long plot summery. This mobile suit got to be in 2 gundam series and the hobby version was in the 4th movie in the gundam franchise. I removed the Advance of zeta units due to the fact the manga and photo novels are harder to get in the us but i should at least get to work on the ones in the animation.Jeffpiatt 12:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)