User talk:Lilkunta

: I asked 4 admins aside from metros bc of bias/threats like this :

Will you agree to stop using all forms of nonstandard color and font outside of this talk page (User talk:Lilkunta)? It doesn't matter who says they are "ok with it," because even those of us who are not "ok with it" still have to read what you've written. If you agree, are unblocked, and continue to use a nonstandard font or color, you will be reblocked. Also, you're going to need to fully understand that your user and user talk pages are not a place for your political grandstanding. Note that incivility is not tolerated. No good faith edit is vandalism, and users leaving you warnings about your actions certainly are not vandalizing this page. - auburnpilot talk 18:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC)}}

Replies like this sound 2 me liek the reviewer isnt checking all the involved info.

What is uncivil is others editing my talk page to how they want it to look.

What is uncivil is make false charges when if the person had looked they would have seen that I didnt delete; I archived. Positive & negative criticism is a part of life.

The so called 'good faith' edits were not in good faith IMO bc doing a little looking b4 leaping, 'Darth' & all the others will c the comments. I archived the comments bc they were lengthening my talk page. Lilkunta 12:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Lilkunta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As usual the orig block from User:Darthgriz98 was wrong. I didnt delete the comments. They were archived. Also, admin OTHER THAN review b/c 'metros' is bias. Thx.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=As usual the orig block from [[User:Darthgriz98]] was wrong. I didnt delete the comments. They were archived. Also, '''admin OTHER THAN review b/c 'metros' is bias'''. Thx. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=As usual the orig block from [[User:Darthgriz98]] was wrong. I didnt delete the comments. They were archived. Also, '''admin OTHER THAN review b/c 'metros' is bias'''. Thx. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=As usual the orig block from [[User:Darthgriz98]] was wrong. I didnt delete the comments. They were archived. Also, '''admin OTHER THAN review b/c 'metros' is bias'''. Thx. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Will you agree to stop using all forms of nonstandard color and font outside of this talk page (User talk:Lilkunta)? It doesn't matter who says they are "ok with it," because even those of us who are not "ok with it" still have to read what you've written. If you agree, are unblocked, and continue to use a nonstandard font or color, you will be reblocked. Also, you're going to need to fully understand that your user and user talk pages are not a place for your political grandstanding. Note that incivility is not tolerated. No good faith edit is vandalism, and users leaving you warnings about your actions certainly are not vandalizing this page. - auburnpilot talk 18:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC)