Jump to content

User talk:Twinkler4: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Twinkler4 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:Twinkler4/Status2}}
{{User:Twinkler4/Status2}}


'''I will be very slow editing [[wikipedia]] for a while, I [[sprain]]ed my right [[wrist]] in [[dodgeball]] so I have to be a lefty for awhile :( it hurts really really bad --[[User:Twinkler4|♫Twinkler4♫]] 02:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)'''
'''I am a cock loverand love them a little to much, I [[sprain]]ed my right [[wrist]] in [[dodgeball]] so I have to be a lefty for awhile :( it hurts really really bad --[[User:Twinkler4|♫Twinkler4♫]] 02:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)'''


Update! My wrist is feeling much better, so I can edit wikipedia faster and more comfortably
Update! My wrist is feeling much better, so I can edit wikipedia faster and more comfortably

Revision as of 23:38, 11 June 2007

I am a cock loverand love them a little to much, I sprained my right wrist in dodgeball so I have to be a lefty for awhile :( it hurts really really bad --♫Twinkler4♫ 02:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update! My wrist is feeling much better, so I can edit wikipedia faster and more comfortably --♫Twinkler4♫ (Talk to me!) 17:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We hate vandalism!!


  • Please be nice to me on my talk page!
  • Be nice to fellow wikipedians also!
  • I am always ready to help (when I'm online of course)
  • If I am offline I will not respond to your message until I am online (duh!)
  • If you ask me something I will respond on your own talk page.
  • Comments also welcomed, complaints are sadly welcomed also, :( but I don't like them that much...
  • But if I messed up on something let me know (nicely)!
  • Always, always, always be civil.
  • Thank you, come again!


Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar award; it's fascinating how many ignoramuses/fanatics/sociopaths are out there. Wombatcat 16:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Newbie Peeps

This spot is available for my newbie peeps I have greeted who want to drop a comment or question. :)

Woah! Nice boxes. I wish I had a bunch of things I could list out. I'll have to think of some and see if there are boxes for them. Cold-NiTe 02:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What if I want you to bite me.

Hey, Twinkler4. I'm Spark Moon. Thanks for the welcome! See you around Wikipedia later (yes, I included the link)! XD

Cool! See you around! :] Spark Moon


Thank you very much for your kind welcome message. The cookies were virtually perfect! Best wishes, Stephenserjeant 18:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Twinkler, thank you for your greeting! My first contribution was rather short but I will be back to flesh it out. Looking forward to learning the ropes and contributing more! Thanks again Littrans 18:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought about db-ing it as spam, but it doesn't really name any companies, and it's similar to the demographics sections on each US city page. Corvus cornix 23:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe put an unsourced and wikify tag on it? Corvus cornix 23:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. Now that the demographic information is gone, I might support a speedy deletion. Corvus cornix 22:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've listed it for AfD. Are you interested in discussing it there? Corvus cornix 20:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

Is there anything (warnings?) I can do about a user who repeatedly vandalizes this page (my talk page)? It is really offending me and I don't know what else to do! All I did was put a greeting on his page!--♫Twinkler4♫ 00:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warn the user, and if it doesn't stop, tell an admin or leave a note at WP:AIV Bjelleklang - talk Bug Me 01:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My sig

Please Read WP:SIG first.Arnon Chaffin (Talk) 20:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting back the Simon Cowell page in tact. I am sort of revamping it and it was a mistake that I deleted a part, I put it straight back but kind of found that you already did it so thanks again,212.21.113.162 22:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Status Button

Of course! You need to create a subpage titled User:Twinkler4/Status2 Then what you do is you put this text on the page: {{User:Twinkler4/StatusChange2|online}} and whenever you want to change the status, just delete the "online" and put "away." After you put that text on the page, you need to put this text on your User Page: {{User:Twinkler4/Status2}} and the button will be displayed in the upper right hand corner of the screen. Additionally, you can put the same text ( {{User:Twinkler4/Status2}} ) on your talk page and the button will appear there too. I am sorry if those directions are hard to follow. If they are, please feel free to ask me questions on my talk page and I will help you. Cheers! Wikipediarules2221 23:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work! Wikipediarules2221 00:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the Invite, and some questions

I have yet to read the detailed wiki intro pages for writers and please ignore anything that will be answered there. I will try to be as detailed as poissble with yes/no questions so that you can type as little as needed, but feel free to simply ignore me, espically if you beleive I am about to discover all the answers anyway. I really only have one question: Should I write anything at all in my page?

I can not conceive of anything I would not myself consider some form of indirect marketing. What is custumary?

I understand the wiki software somehow knows you are registered to absorb new writers such as myself. (and correct me please, as...) I will see you as my writing style mentor to help me conform with standards, in as much as this term is relevant. I will nag you as little as possible if at all, but would request any additinal URL guidance in this matter. I appreciate your help.

Ohadaloni 19:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)ohadaloni[reply]



Please disregard the above to save typing, and the next question is, (and follwoing I will rephrase as a yes/no):

Are there separate Verifiability guidelines for Wikipedia pages VS the adjacent discussion pages?

I have yet to edit the first page which is true content for lack of confidence on this issue. Am I adhering to Verifiabilty wikipedia standards by making sure my comments, potentially not 100% verfiable, only appear as part of a talk page on the subject matter, with the hope someone with more verification on the issue will eventually transfer the content to the main page, thereby also insuring the verifiabilty of the content of the main page?

If there is no ready URL for this next one, please do not type an answer. It might be long:

How does the Be Bold guideline assist in answering the last question, if at all?

--Ohadaloni 19:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]