User talk:Big.P: Difference between revisions
{{subst:socksuspectnotice|1=Big.P (2nd)}} ~~~~ |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:It is a great shame that abomination of an article has resurfaced. I fought tooth and nail to get that thing removed, even banned from fallout with Wikipedians of a differing opinion. I will look over the article soon to make sure it is indeed what you say, that it is almost the same thing that was deleted, and I will re-nominate it for deletion. -- <b>[[User:big.p|<font color="1e90ff">ßίζ</font>]]<font color="daa520">·</font><font color="008000">[[User:Big.P/Esperanza|קּ‼]]</font> <font color="daa520"><small>([[User talk:big.p|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/big.P|contribs]])</small></font></b> 09:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC) |
:It is a great shame that abomination of an article has resurfaced. I fought tooth and nail to get that thing removed, even banned from fallout with Wikipedians of a differing opinion. I will look over the article soon to make sure it is indeed what you say, that it is almost the same thing that was deleted, and I will re-nominate it for deletion. -- <b>[[User:big.p|<font color="1e90ff">ßίζ</font>]]<font color="daa520">·</font><font color="008000">[[User:Big.P/Esperanza|קּ‼]]</font> <font color="daa520"><small>([[User talk:big.p|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/big.P|contribs]])</small></font></b> 09:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
Thanks for the heads-up, Big.P! I posted my vote on the AfD page. You are excellent! [[User:Dupuy78|Dupuy78]] 10:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for the heads-up, Big.P! I posted my vote on the AfD page. You are excellent! [[User:Dupuy78|Dupuy78]] 10:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
==[[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|Sockpuppetry]] case== |
|||
{| align="left" |
|||
|| [[Image:Puppeter template.svg|50px]] |
|||
|} |
|||
You have been accused of [[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|sockpuppetry]]. Please refer to [[{{highssp|1={{BASEPAGENAME}}}}]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect|notes for the suspect]] before editing the evidence page. |
|||
{{do not delete}}-[[User:SpuriousQ|SpuriousQ]] ([[User talk:SpuriousQ|talk]]) 09:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:29, 14 June 2007
Kiwi Camera
Hi, BigP. I was reading a completely POV and self-serving "article" about Kiwi Camara, and while marveling at it, saw that it had already been deleted before. It is being rebuilt now, with no difference but more “citations” -- to references which themselves don't bear out the points being made. I don't know enough about the procedures here, so I wanted to ask if you can enforce the removal again, for all the reasons you stated in your 2006 nomination -- particularly that the person himself is not notable, even if the controversy itself were to be thought so. Added to your initial reasons, I note that the present “article” rather negatively characterizes the actions of live persons, who are named individually. Thanks! Dupuy78 03:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- It is a great shame that abomination of an article has resurfaced. I fought tooth and nail to get that thing removed, even banned from fallout with Wikipedians of a differing opinion. I will look over the article soon to make sure it is indeed what you say, that it is almost the same thing that was deleted, and I will re-nominate it for deletion. -- ßίζ·קּ‼ (talk | contribs) 09:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up, Big.P! I posted my vote on the AfD page. You are excellent! Dupuy78 10:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)