Jump to content

User talk:PhysPhD: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Article needing your attention
Line 26: Line 26:


Thank you [[User:Keshe Theory|Keshe Theory]] 07:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC) keshe
Thank you [[User:Keshe Theory|Keshe Theory]] 07:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC) keshe

==Article needing your attention==
Hi, can you please look at: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluid entropy]] and vote? I think more physicists should participate in this particular vote. Thanks. [[User:Dan Gluck|Dan Gluck]] 17:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:42, 28 June 2007

Welcome!

Hello, PhysPhD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 02:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Dear PhysPhD, it is better if you reveal your identity at your user page. Otherwise one may have suspicion that you are sockpuppet. Concerning the violation of wikipedia policy I have nowhere violated it, I have just presented what is written by me - Georgiev, in published article!!! This is objective and can be written by anyone who reads my article. The debate is Unruh vs. Georgiev, so it seems unwise to present only one side of the debate without saying what IS Georgiev's thesis in the debate.Danko Georgiev MD 12:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear PhysPhD, again welcome to Wikipedia. I am sorry to say, but it appears that you have promptly found yourself in the midst of the nuttier elements of Wikipedia. I would very much like to assure you that most of WP is not at all like this, and that it is in fact populated by a large number of highly intelligent and rational personalities; I say this in the hope that you will not be quickly discouraged simply because you have found yourself surrounded by cranks. It appears that you have found Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics; I'm sorry to note that it has been a bit moribund of late, certainly not as active and vital as Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics. If, perhaps, you do find yourself at wits end, and would like assistance or consolation, then certainly Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics would be a good place to turn. linas 15:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

possiblity of peer reviw

Thank you for your response,

Then is it possible to submit two papers for your peer review section, that once they are approved by your knowledgeable panels then you can bring the matter into the right site.

One paper is titled “The seed of the earth” [1]

The second is “The creation of gravity”. [2]

Thank you Keshe Theory 07:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC) keshe[reply]

Article needing your attention

Hi, can you please look at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluid entropy and vote? I think more physicists should participate in this particular vote. Thanks. Dan Gluck 17:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]