Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renee LaRue: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:18, 19 July 2007

No arguments found within the article for notability per WP:PORNBIO Tabercil 03:20, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE. Fails to establish notability. Besides, if I haven't seen her yet, she's not major or even significantly minor. Qworty 03:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sure that was intended as a joke, but I have to ask: So whether or not you personally know something is the arbiter of whether it's real or notable? Morgan Wick 03:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Depends on his area of expertise, if he's, say, a major porn film producer. :) =Axlq 03:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Actually, notice that the WP:IDONTKNOWIT argument followed the word "besides," thus implying it was not the reasoning behind his !vote, which would appear to be "Fails to establish notability." Someguy1221 05:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. =Axlq 03:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 04:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Oyster guitarist 05:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. *drew 09:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 *'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Bart133|Bart133]] <sup>[[User talk:Bart133|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/Bart133|(c)]]</sup> 04:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Oysterguitarist|Oyster]][[User talk:Oysterguitarist|'''guitarist''']] 05:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:*drew|*drew]] 09:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)