Jump to content

User talk:TheFarix: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Anime Detour: moved resonce to user's talkpage
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
* [[User talk:TheFarix/Archive 3|January 2007 – June 2007]]
* [[User talk:TheFarix/Archive 3|January 2007 – June 2007]]
}}
}}

==What the heck!?!==
Why do I keep getting in trouble in the Hrry Potter and TDH talk page. You guys arne't explaing me, just keep giving me link to talk page guidelines which doesn't explain wht I'm doing wrong.


== Japanese episode list ==
== Japanese episode list ==

Revision as of 03:27, 24 July 2007

What the heck!?!

Why do I keep getting in trouble in the Hrry Potter and TDH talk page. You guys arne't explaing me, just keep giving me link to talk page guidelines which doesn't explain wht I'm doing wrong.

Japanese episode list

On two of the pages that you switched from {{List of Anime Episodes TV}} to {{Japanese episode list}}, the headers there were meant for actual navigation due to the length of the summaries. Is there a reason for the deprecation?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other then the fact that {{List of Anime Episodes TV}} is a near duplicate of {{Japanese episode list}} and is also up for WP:TfD? That's reason enough. --Farix (Talk) 01:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One of the Template talk pages mentions the differences between the two... And the former allows for the headers for navigability of the two lists I edit.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But only two article, List of Kamen Rider Den-O episodes and List of Juken Sentai Gekiranger episodes, ever used section headings to separate episode summaries and even those two probably shouldn't be using them either. But you found a workaround, so there shouldn't be a problem. --Farix (Talk) 02:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
True, but the workaround is a little difficult to work with. And why is it that section headers shouldn't be used?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Because it's ugly and it creates a TOC that is far too large. --Farix (Talk) 02:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing on this page? You're totally screwing up the formatting and making the list look bad. I picked the template on purpose as it looks better than the other one. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 16:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The old formating was just too crowded and looks god-awful by combining two different mini-episode titles into one small cell. The format I used separates the mini-episodes into their own fields and summaries can be easily added at a future time. --Farix (Talk) 16:10, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anime Detour

Unless you'd care to post on the talk page what sort of POV is being pushed in the article, stop adding a tag that claims it's there. Jtrainor 22:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]