Talk:International Nuclear Event Scale: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m fmt |
Is there level8? |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Moved 17 Jan 2006 (unambiguous correction). [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 16:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC) |
Moved 17 Jan 2006 (unambiguous correction). [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 16:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Is there level8? == |
|||
Looks like an event worse then Chernobyl is possible. Is there a level8 for china syndrome or somethng like a terror attack? |
|||
Revision as of 20:55, 25 July 2007
Page move
International Nuclear Events Scale → International Nuclear Event Scale – The official name has "event" not "events". The NRC, IEA and DOE all use "event". -- Kjkolb 04:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
- Support: a no-brainer Rwendland 13:41, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Moved 17 Jan 2006 (unambiguous correction). Rd232 talk 16:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Is there level8?
Looks like an event worse then Chernobyl is possible. Is there a level8 for china syndrome or somethng like a terror attack?