Category talk:Humour: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
HereToHelp (talk | contribs) m formatting |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Possible move== |
==Possible move== |
||
To be consistent with the Wikipedia article [[humour]], would not a move to <nowiki>[[Category:Humour]]</nowiki> be appropriate. [[User:Mintguy|Mintguy]] [[User talk: Mintguy|(T)]] |
To be consistent with the Wikipedia article [[humour]], would not a move to <nowiki>[[Category:Humour]]</nowiki> be appropriate. [[User:Mintguy|Mintguy]] [[User talk: Mintguy|(T)]] |
||
: Perhaps better would be to switch the ''humour'' article back to ''humor'', where the article started (it was changed, in violation of WP guidelines, some time ago). --[[User:Cultural Freedom|Cultural Freedom]] [[User talk:Cultural Freedom|''talk'']] 2007-08-28 21:01 21:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Include link to [[:Category:Wikipedia humor]] or not?== |
==Include link to [[:Category:Wikipedia humor]] or not?== |
||
Revision as of 21:01, 28 August 2007
Possible move
To be consistent with the Wikipedia article humour, would not a move to [[Category:Humour]] be appropriate. Mintguy (T)
- Perhaps better would be to switch the humour article back to humor, where the article started (it was changed, in violation of WP guidelines, some time ago). --Cultural Freedom talk 2007-08-28 21:01 21:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Include link to Category:Wikipedia humor or not?
I think we should, it's disambiguating, and it is humor. It's just a link. Go to image and there's a link to Wikipedia:image. Let's just put it in; it's not a paper encyclopedia, so there's no space requirement, and after all, it's just a link. --HereToHelp (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)