Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial Music Machine: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Can you give a pointer to the applicable policy?
Line 8: Line 8:
* '''Keep''' This entry meets the WikiProject Music criteria for importance, because one of the musicians on this label ([[Merzbow]]) meets the criteria for notability. [[Special:Contributions/76.99.4.15|76.99.4.15]] ([[User talk:76.99.4.15|talk]]) 17:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)</small>
* '''Keep''' This entry meets the WikiProject Music criteria for importance, because one of the musicians on this label ([[Merzbow]]) meets the criteria for notability. [[Special:Contributions/76.99.4.15|76.99.4.15]] ([[User talk:76.99.4.15|talk]]) 17:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)</small>
*:Can you give a pointer to the applicable policy? All I can find is [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD/Notability]] which points to [[Wikipedia:Notability (music)]] which does not mention notability of a label by association. [[User:Hankwang|Han-Kwang]] ([[User talk:Hankwang|t]]) 19:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
*:Can you give a pointer to the applicable policy? All I can find is [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD/Notability]] which points to [[Wikipedia:Notability (music)]] which does not mention notability of a label by association. [[User:Hankwang|Han-Kwang]] ([[User talk:Hankwang|t]]) 19:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
*::Hmm... Aren't all record labels on Wikipedia notable 'by association' of the notable artists involved? [[Special:Contributions/76.99.4.15|76.99.4.15]] ([[User talk:76.99.4.15|talk]]) 17:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:06, 3 September 2007

Artificial Music Machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable, not much assertion of notability, does not meet WP:CORP. Proposed deletion a while ago was part of a disruption and reverted.[1]. Delete. Han-Kwang (t) 11:35, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]