Jump to content

Wikipedia:Spoiler: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
See the section "Spoiler tags are redundant in plot summary sections" and the section "2007-9-14" on the talk page.
Jere7my (talk | contribs)
New draft — with some evidence of consensus!
Line 3: Line 3:
{{nutshell|Wikipedia contains revealing plot details of fictional works; this is expected. Spoiler warnings should only be used in articles about fictional subjects. When adding or removing a spoiler warning, be prepared to obtain consensus.}}
{{nutshell|Wikipedia contains revealing plot details of fictional works; this is expected. Spoiler warnings should only be used in articles about fictional subjects. When adding or removing a spoiler warning, be prepared to obtain consensus.}}


Wikipedia uses spoiler tags to mark off certain significant plot details ("[[Spoiler (media)|spoilers]]") in articles about fictional works. This is an ''exception'' to the style guideline [[wikipedia:no disclaimers in articles|no disclaimers in articles]]. However, since Wikipedia is a user-created and user-edited encyclopedia, there is never a guarantee that any given article will be tagged for spoilers; [[caveat lector]]!
A '''[[spoiler (media)|spoiler]]''' is a piece of information in an article about a narrative work (such as a book, feature film, television show or video game) that reveals [[plot (narrative)|plot]] [[event]]s or [[twist ending|twist]]s.


==Usage==
Spoilers on the Internet are sometimes preceded by a spoiler warning.<ref>Examples include [[IMDB]], [[GameFAQs]], [[Television Without Pity]], and [[TV.com]].</ref> In Wikipedia, however, it is generally expected that the subjects of our articles will be covered in detail. For purposes of style and clarity, spoiler notices should only be used if a plot spoiler appears in an unexpected place. When a spoiler notice is used, it should be placed with careful consideration to assure that it does not create a damaging effect on article organization. As with all content notices and issues, if placement or removal of a spoiler notice is disputed, talk page discussion should be used to find [[WP:Consensus|consensus]] with regard to whether or not a spoiler notice shall be used in the article, and if so, where it would best be placed.
To insert a spoiler tag, enter the text '''<nowiki>{{spoiler}}</nowiki>''' before the passage to be marked off, and close the tag with '''<nowiki>{{endspoiler}}</nowiki>'''. For further details on syntax, see the [[Template:Spoiler|template page]]. Since the {{tl|spoiler}} tag exists, it should never be necessary to add homebrew spoiler protection to articles.


Spoiler tags should only be used when there is a reasonable expectation that [[Suspense|narrative suspense]] is a significant element in the appreciation of the work. Often they won't be necessary at all if the article is well-structured. As with all Wikipedia edits, spoiler tags should be guided by [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] editing; if you are in doubt, discuss the matter first on the article's talk page.
Spoiler tags are an exception to our general guideline [[wikipedia:no disclaimers in articles|no disclaimers in articles]], and the weight and significance of the disclaimers guideline should be considered when trying to form a consensus for their use. Concerns about revealing spoilers in an article's lead should be governed by the [[Wikipedia:Lead section|lead section style guideline]].


Below are some questions to ask before adding, deleting, or moving a spoiler tag:
It is not acceptable to delete information from an article about a work of fiction because you think it spoils the plot. Such concerns must not interfere with [[Wikipedia:neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], encyclopedic tone, completeness, or any other element of article quality. Do not make spoiler-free parallel versions ([[Wikipedia:Content forking|content forks]]). Other unacceptable approaches include concealing spoilers using codes such as [[ROT13]], and setting the text and background colors to the same color using [[HTML]].


==Is it widely known?==
==When spoiler warnings should not be used==
*If a plot point has made significant penetration into popular culture, it is often no longer necessary to mark it off with spoiler tags. The existence of well-known parodies and other unconnected pop-culture references can be cited as evidence for "significant penetration".
*Spoiler warnings are usually inappropriate in articles discussing classical works of literature, poetry and theatre. In grey areas, editors placing spoiler templates should use the article's talk page to discuss the matter.
*The older a work is, the more likely its plot details are to be widely known. After a certain point, the age of a work usually makes spoiler tags completely unnecessary — nobody needs to be warned about the ultimate fate of Hamlet — but age alone is not always sufficient for lesser-known works. (A newly discovered Shakespeare play could well demand spoiler protection for a while!)
*Spoilers and spoiler warnings should not be used in articles on non-fictional subjects. If explicit spoilers<ref>An explicit spoiler mentions the work of fiction concerned.</ref> are mentioned in non-fiction articles (''e.g.'' articles on authors, actors, real-life locations in which fictional texts are set, or literary concepts like [[climax]]), consider whether the spoiler improves the encyclopedic quality of the article. It may be better to remove the example.
*A very new work may be better served by the {{tl|current fiction}} tag, which duplicates and adds to the information in the {{tl|spoiler}} tag. A {{tl|current fiction}} tag should be added to the beginning of the article, whereas {{tl|spoiler}} tags are used within an article to mark off particular passages.
*Spoiler warnings are usually redundant when used inside "Plot" or "Synopsis" sections, or fictional "History" sections of any sort in articles whose subject is fictional, since spoilers are to be expected in a plot summary. If readers can easily deduce what is to be covered within a titled section, then there is no need to insert additional warning tags. If a section is not explicitly tagged as a plot section, and it contains an unexpected spoiler, consider whether the article can be improved by better section titling.
*Spoiler warnings should not be used when they can be replaced by more accurate heading information. If a "Themes" heading starts with a plot description, the best thing to do is break the plot description into a separate heading. If there are no headings, it is usually better to add them.
*Articles about fictional characters, objects, or places can be expected to include significant elements of the story. They should only contain spoiler warnings around specific details that a reader might not expect to come across.


==Are spoilers implied by the section title?==
==When spoiler warnings may be appropriate==
*A section header such as "Plot Summary," "Detailed Summary," or "Synopsis" can be considered a de facto spoiler notice — a synopsis will necessarily describe the entire plot, so there's usually no need to repeat the warning.
* Spoiler notices may be appropriate when significant plot revelations appear in unexpected places.
*A section header such as "Plot" or "Overview" can be ambiguous as to the presence of detailed spoilers, particularly for a newcomer to Wikipedia. If that section contains significant spoilers, consider changing the header to something clearer. Sometimes, a separate "Overview" paragraph may be appropriate (or may be included in the lede), containing a "back-of-the-book" style overview of the story, in which case significant plot details should be moved to a more clearly labeled section.
* Spoiler notices are more likely to be appropriate in newer works than in older works. But consider using instead the {{tl|current fiction}} tag, which is consistent with the {{tl|current}} tag on current real-world events.
*If separate sections are not appropriate for the article, you may consider merging them into a single section: an opening paragraph that offers an overview of the plot, then a detailed passage marked off with spoiler tags.
* Very rarely, a spoiler warning may appear in the article lead. Plot details that are not significant from an ''out-of-universe'' perspective should not be found in the lead at all. See [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)]]
*If a plot detail that arises in an ''unexpected'' place — a "Cast of Characters" or "Setting" section, for instance — consider moving that detail to a more appropriate section, or changing the section title. Alternatively, the unexpected plot detail may be marked off with spoiler tags. (Remember that those who are likely to be surprised are those who are unfamiliar with the work, so they may not know where to expect spoilers!)
*In a work that is uncommonly reliant on the impact of a plot twist or surprise ending — a murder mystery, for instance — a spoiler tag may be appropriate even within a properly labeled "Synopsis" section, if local editors agree. These should be sourced when possible (e.g., by citing a professional reviewer who describes the impact of the surprise).


==Should this article contain spoilers?==
==How to add or remove spoiler warnings==
*Yes! It is almost never acceptable to delete information from an article because it constitutes a spoiler. Consider moving it or marking it off with spoiler tags — that's why they exist, after all!
* Where it is appropriate, a '''{{[[Template:Spoiler|Spoiler]]}}''' tag can be used to mark spoiler sections, with '''{{[[Template:Endspoiler|Endspoiler]]}}''' to mark the end. Whether one is adding or removing, be sure to do both. Do not improvise such warnings in plain text.
*Spoiler tags should not be used in articles on non-fictional subjects. If explicit spoilers<ref>An explicit spoiler mentions the work of fiction concerned.</ref> are mentioned in non-fiction articles (''e.g.'' articles on authors, actors, real-life locations in which fictional texts are set, or literary concepts like [[climax]]), consider whether that plot detail improves the encyclopedic quality of the article. It may be better to remove the example.
* When adding a spoiler notice to a plot section of an article that has a clear section heading indicating it is a plot section, it is best to use the {{[[Template:Spoiler|Spoiler]]}} and {{[[Template:Endspoiler|Endspoiler]]}} templates to bracket only the portion of the plot that includes the spoilers. That way readers can benefit from the other parts of the plot summary that do not include spoilers, while knowing which sections to skip if they wish to avoid the spoilers.
* A reminder: before adding or removing a tag it is helpful to check the talk page; others may already be discussing the tag in question, or may have consensus as to its presence or absence.


==Notes==
==Notes==

Revision as of 05:10, 15 September 2007

Wikipedia uses spoiler tags to mark off certain significant plot details ("spoilers") in articles about fictional works. This is an exception to the style guideline no disclaimers in articles. However, since Wikipedia is a user-created and user-edited encyclopedia, there is never a guarantee that any given article will be tagged for spoilers; caveat lector!

Usage

To insert a spoiler tag, enter the text {{spoiler}} before the passage to be marked off, and close the tag with {{endspoiler}}. For further details on syntax, see the template page. Since the {{spoiler}} tag exists, it should never be necessary to add homebrew spoiler protection to articles.

Spoiler tags should only be used when there is a reasonable expectation that narrative suspense is a significant element in the appreciation of the work. Often they won't be necessary at all if the article is well-structured. As with all Wikipedia edits, spoiler tags should be guided by consensus editing; if you are in doubt, discuss the matter first on the article's talk page.

Below are some questions to ask before adding, deleting, or moving a spoiler tag:

Is it widely known?

  • If a plot point has made significant penetration into popular culture, it is often no longer necessary to mark it off with spoiler tags. The existence of well-known parodies and other unconnected pop-culture references can be cited as evidence for "significant penetration".
  • The older a work is, the more likely its plot details are to be widely known. After a certain point, the age of a work usually makes spoiler tags completely unnecessary — nobody needs to be warned about the ultimate fate of Hamlet — but age alone is not always sufficient for lesser-known works. (A newly discovered Shakespeare play could well demand spoiler protection for a while!)
  • A very new work may be better served by the {{current fiction}} tag, which duplicates and adds to the information in the {{spoiler}} tag. A {{current fiction}} tag should be added to the beginning of the article, whereas {{spoiler}} tags are used within an article to mark off particular passages.

Are spoilers implied by the section title?

  • A section header such as "Plot Summary," "Detailed Summary," or "Synopsis" can be considered a de facto spoiler notice — a synopsis will necessarily describe the entire plot, so there's usually no need to repeat the warning.
  • A section header such as "Plot" or "Overview" can be ambiguous as to the presence of detailed spoilers, particularly for a newcomer to Wikipedia. If that section contains significant spoilers, consider changing the header to something clearer. Sometimes, a separate "Overview" paragraph may be appropriate (or may be included in the lede), containing a "back-of-the-book" style overview of the story, in which case significant plot details should be moved to a more clearly labeled section.
  • If separate sections are not appropriate for the article, you may consider merging them into a single section: an opening paragraph that offers an overview of the plot, then a detailed passage marked off with spoiler tags.
  • If a plot detail that arises in an unexpected place — a "Cast of Characters" or "Setting" section, for instance — consider moving that detail to a more appropriate section, or changing the section title. Alternatively, the unexpected plot detail may be marked off with spoiler tags. (Remember that those who are likely to be surprised are those who are unfamiliar with the work, so they may not know where to expect spoilers!)
  • In a work that is uncommonly reliant on the impact of a plot twist or surprise ending — a murder mystery, for instance — a spoiler tag may be appropriate even within a properly labeled "Synopsis" section, if local editors agree. These should be sourced when possible (e.g., by citing a professional reviewer who describes the impact of the surprise).

Should this article contain spoilers?

  • Yes! It is almost never acceptable to delete information from an article because it constitutes a spoiler. Consider moving it or marking it off with spoiler tags — that's why they exist, after all!
  • Spoiler tags should not be used in articles on non-fictional subjects. If explicit spoilers[1] are mentioned in non-fiction articles (e.g. articles on authors, actors, real-life locations in which fictional texts are set, or literary concepts like climax), consider whether that plot detail improves the encyclopedic quality of the article. It may be better to remove the example.

Notes

  1. ^ An explicit spoiler mentions the work of fiction concerned.