Talk:List of Ipswich Town F.C. seasons: Difference between revisions
→Ray Crawford: poor old ray |
→Footnote 7: done? |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
I noticed this was positioned inconsistently with footnote 8. Then I read 7, and it struck me that if all results were annulled, they shouldn't be included in the list. I'd replace with n/a (as with footnote 8) and place the annulled stats in the footnote. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] 11:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC) |
I noticed this was positioned inconsistently with footnote 8. Then I read 7, and it struck me that if all results were annulled, they shouldn't be included in the list. I'd replace with n/a (as with footnote 8) and place the annulled stats in the footnote. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] 11:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:Done this I think. [[User:193.82.16.50|193.82.16.50]] 09:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC) (easyRambler) |
|||
== [[Ray Crawford]] == |
== [[Ray Crawford]] == |
||
Revision as of 09:42, 18 September 2007
 | Football Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
This template must be substituted. Replace {{FLC ...}} with {{subst:FLC ...}}.
Charity Shield
As this is a fairly innocuous competition rarely competed for by ITFC, I suggest it's removed from the main list and added either as footnotes or as a separate section (or both). --Dweller 11:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- (As done for Texaco Trophy) --Dweller 11:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Blanks
I think people would expect to find no unexplained blanks in the professional era list. How about shading for ineligibility or (in the case of the League Cup) not applicable? On the same theme, I'd expect to see top scorer for every pro season completed and a "not known" or similar for the amateur seasons. --Dweller 11:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- I did add a note to the footnote to the effect that if no scorer was mentioned, none was known. Would you prefer I explicitly added not known to each empty row? 193.82.16.50 09:27, 18 September 2007 (UTC) (easyCafe Rambler)
Fair play
Needs a little further explanation, or (better) a wikilink. --Dweller 11:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've now wikilinked to the appropriate article and expanded the phrasing a touch. 193.82.16.50 09:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC) (easyCafe Rambler)
Footnote 7
I noticed this was positioned inconsistently with footnote 8. Then I read 7, and it struck me that if all results were annulled, they shouldn't be included in the list. I'd replace with n/a (as with footnote 8) and place the annulled stats in the footnote. --Dweller 11:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Done this I think. 193.82.16.50 09:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC) (easyRambler)
His achievement (league top scorer) needs its own citation. It also brings to light a pedantic problem - to date, ITFC have only once had a league top scorer (it seems) so the wording in the lead (pluralised) needs some attention. It may also be overcooking it to have a specific legend annotation for something that happened once. Better just to specifically refer to the instance in the lead text (as it's so notable) or just footnote it, and not bother with the bolding unless and until it happens again. Let's hope that's a very very long wait, lol. --Dweller 11:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Okay. Despite the fact I'm editing from my spiritual home (The apple store on Regent Street), I'll play along..! I'll footnote it, or better still, you can do it for me. I trust you, despite the woeful happenings of the past footballing weekend....! More soon. The Rambling Man 19:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and at least it happened once...! The Rambling Man 19:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Through gritted teeth I've removed the sentence in the lead, removed the bolding and added a footnote. Hopefully you think that's enough..! 193.82.16.50 09:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC) (easyRambler)