Jump to content

User talk:ExtraDry: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
fix tag
ExtraDry (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


:Please don't remove previous declined unblock requests, it makes it more difficult to review your block. <font style="background:#990000;color:#FFFFFF;border:2px solid #999999">[[User:SQL|S<sub>Q</sub>L]]</font>[[User talk:SQL|<font color="#999999"><sup>Query me!</sup></font>]] 07:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
:Please don't remove previous declined unblock requests, it makes it more difficult to review your block. <font style="background:#990000;color:#FFFFFF;border:2px solid #999999">[[User:SQL|S<sub>Q</sub>L]]</font>[[User talk:SQL|<font color="#999999"><sup>Query me!</sup></font>]] 07:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

You did not read what got written. I said and I quote No personal attacks were made on '''talkpages''' Which what is what got said in the block log which is incorrect. [[User:ExtraDry|ExtraDry]] 07:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:31, 26 October 2007

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This block will give you a chance to cool down, to maintain civility, and not continue your personal attacks. Carlossuarez46 21:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExtraDry (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Abuse of Admin powers, User does not want me to improve article that He AFD ExtraDry 21:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Inadequate reason for unblock. — Sandstein 22:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Additionally, "It;s [sic] in progress dichead[sic]" is inappropriate and tends to indicate that no admin abuse is happening here. --Yamla 22:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExtraDry (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

31 Hours is overkill, AGF is very hard to do when the article is AFD not even 24 hours after it is created. No personal attacks were made on talkpages.

Decline reason:

No personal attacks were made? What was that, then? MaxSem 07:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please don't remove previous declined unblock requests, it makes it more difficult to review your block. SQLQuery me! 07:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You did not read what got written. I said and I quote No personal attacks were made on talkpages Which what is what got said in the block log which is incorrect. ExtraDry 07:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]