User talk:Kellsboro Jack: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:25, 2 November 2007

Sorry that I "took over" your work on the Pete Bostwick page. I had been working on him, his family, and his sister's Phipps family for some time and after posting, got an "edit conflict" notice that you too were edituing. Handicapper 17:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Handicapper - not to worry and thanks for the vast amount of additions. Great job in fact. I came across his entry page and found it exceptionally thin and more shall we say flowery. I just wanted to add a few bits in while I was fleshing out the entry for F Ambrose Clark. I have provided a decent amount of information on the Bostwick family to another site: Bostwick/Bostock family tree

Pete was a one of a kind polo player - it's a shame his Village Farms polo field and the other stables are largely lifeless in Gilbertsville, NY. Kellsboro Jack

I created a Bostwick family article and Category so if you want to work on Dorothy Campbell or any of the others please do as your efforts are appreciated. Handicapper 14:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pebbles

Nice work on the Pebbles article. She was a great favourite of mine and the extra information on tbe Breeders' Cup win is excellent. I'd forgotten about Come On The Blues travelling with her! Bcp67 05:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Curlin

Per Wikipedia guidelines, information that may be considered potentially defamatory or harmful about living people must be suitably referenced to be included in the encyclopedia. You have added information about living people in jail without bringing suitable sources. You must bring reliable and verifiable sources to have that information in the article. Please do so and there will be no problem. Thank you. -- Avi 15:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Editor speculation about what may happen based on what a judge did or did not do is inappropriate for the encyclopedia. -- Avi 15:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You misunderstand. I have no interest in "winning", "losing", or horse-racing in general. I do have an interest in ensuring wikipedia policies and guidelines are uphelp, as per the agreement you, I, and any editor makes when editing on wikipedia. That is all. -- Avi 16:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:16, 2 November 2007 edit Avraham (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators 49,157 edits →Curlin: Original research/speculation ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:25, 2 November 2007 edit undo Avraham (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators 49,157 edits →Curlin: Misunderstanding Next edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:

	:Also, please see [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball]]. Editor speculation about what may happen based on what a judge did or did not do is inappropriate for the encyclopedia. -- [[User:Avraham\|Avi]] 15:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)		:Also, please see [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball]]. Editor speculation about what may happen based on what a judge did or did not do is inappropriate for the encyclopedia. -- [[User:Avraham\|Avi]] 15:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

			::You misunderstand. I have no interest in "winning", "losing", or horse-racing in general. I '''do''' have an interest in ensuring wikipedia policies and guidelines are uphelp, as per the agreement you, I, and any editor makes when editing on wikipedia. That is all. -- [[User:Avraham\|Avi]] 16:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)