User talk:Dannycali: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
another unblock req, as I am not JB196, and there is no real evidence that proves otherwise |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{unblock|Asking for another request. I can state, with 100% confidence, that I am not a sockpuppet/incarnation of JB196. I have never heard of that user previously, and I am a good editor with a lot of good contributions. The blocking admin basically said "he edits like that user, so he is that user". That is totally false. I would like to be unblocked ASAP as this accusation is totally false. [[User:Dannycali|Dannycali]] 07:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)}} |
|||
:{{takenote}} I'm in the process of handling this request, including contacting the blocking Administrator. Please have patience for the next few minutes. [[User:AGK|<font color="#2A8B31">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] 22:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::No rush, thank you. [[User:Dannycali|Dannycali]] 22:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Read the response from the blocking admin, and it still doesn't show any concrete evidence. It's just a really strange reason to block someone, saying "they act like this user". I can say this with 100% confidence, that I have never heard of JB196, I am not JB196 or connected in any way with that user. I don't get it, I don't deserve to be banned, I'm here to help, not hurt. [[User:Dannycali|Dannycali]] 05:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
{{unblock reviewed|1=although I am basically inactive at this point, I noticed that someone banned me for being an alleged sockpuppet of JB196. I just wanted to say that is totally false. I do not use sockpuppets and I am not JB196, I don't know who that is, it is not me. I'd like to see any evidence that I am a sock of JB196, instead of one user making a bad/false accusation.|decline={{admin|Morven}} appears to be offline at the moment, and as such I'm declining this request '''at this time'''. However, I intend to review the block fully, in light of Morven's reply to [[User talk:Morven#Dannycali (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)|this]] comment at her [[User talk:Morven|talk page]]. If I don't do this within the next 24 hours, please [[User:AGK/Contact/Email|email me]] with a reminder. Cheers, [[User:AGK|<font color="#2A8B31">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] 22:43, 2 November 2007 (UTC)}} |
|||
Revision as of 07:58, 5 November 2007
Dannycali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Asking for another request. I can state, with 100% confidence, that I am not a sockpuppet/incarnation of JB196. I have never heard of that user previously, and I am a good editor with a lot of good contributions. The blocking admin basically said "he edits like that user, so he is that user". That is totally false. I would like to be unblocked ASAP as this accusation is totally false. Dannycali 07:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Asking for another request. I can state, with 100% confidence, that I am not a sockpuppet/incarnation of JB196. I have never heard of that user previously, and I am a good editor with a lot of good contributions. The blocking admin basically said "he edits like that user, so he is that user". That is totally false. I would like to be unblocked ASAP as this accusation is totally false. [[User:Dannycali|Dannycali]] 07:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Asking for another request. I can state, with 100% confidence, that I am not a sockpuppet/incarnation of JB196. I have never heard of that user previously, and I am a good editor with a lot of good contributions. The blocking admin basically said "he edits like that user, so he is that user". That is totally false. I would like to be unblocked ASAP as this accusation is totally false. [[User:Dannycali|Dannycali]] 07:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Asking for another request. I can state, with 100% confidence, that I am not a sockpuppet/incarnation of JB196. I have never heard of that user previously, and I am a good editor with a lot of good contributions. The blocking admin basically said "he edits like that user, so he is that user". That is totally false. I would like to be unblocked ASAP as this accusation is totally false. [[User:Dannycali|Dannycali]] 07:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}