User talk:86.16.103.211: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
talk |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I think the notability is quite clear if you follow the links to it. I can see why your page has been vandalised so many times, you're a prick. This is a legitimate piece of history and I'll report you if you vandalise it again. |
I think the notability is quite clear if you follow the links to it. I can see why your page has been vandalised so many times, you're a prick. This is a legitimate piece of history and I'll report you if you vandalise it again. |
||
:Your unwillingness to discuss the topic rationally gives merit to the fact that you can't explain its notability. I await your reasoned response. -- <font color="#000080">Mufka</font> [[User:Mufka|<sup>(u)</sup>]] [[User talk:Mufka|<sup>(t)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Mufka|<sup>(c)]]</sup> 19:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC) |
:Your unwillingness to discuss the topic rationally gives merit to the fact that you can't explain its notability. I await your reasoned response. -- <font color="#000080">Mufka</font> [[User:Mufka|<sup>(u)</sup>]] [[User talk:Mufka|<sup>(t)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Mufka|<sup>(c)]]</sup> 19:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
it is notable because it is a very significant moment in the history of The Troubles. you haven't given a reason as to why it's not notable. I'm reporting you for vandalism. |
|||
Revision as of 19:16, 6 November 2007
Warnings
November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to March 1, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)- Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to March 1. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:86.16.103.211. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
The suggestion that my contribution was not constructive is untrue and insulting. Do not remove it again, it is a legitimate piece of history.
- I'd love to discuss it with you, but if you add it again, it will be removed and you will be warned again. Please discuss the notability of the subject on the talk page. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
I think the notability is quite clear if you follow the links to it. I can see why your page has been vandalised so many times, you're a prick. This is a legitimate piece of history and I'll report you if you vandalise it again.
- Your unwillingness to discuss the topic rationally gives merit to the fact that you can't explain its notability. I await your reasoned response. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
it is notable because it is a very significant moment in the history of The Troubles. you haven't given a reason as to why it's not notable. I'm reporting you for vandalism.