Talk:Ghostwriter (1992 TV series): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
GPN is only allowed to sell Ghostwriter to schools and libraries starting mid-2007 due to a change in licensing terms. The details of this change are unknown. If anyone has information, please contribute.<br /> |
GPN is only allowed to sell Ghostwriter to schools and libraries starting mid-2007 due to a change in licensing terms. The details of this change are unknown. If anyone has information, please contribute.<br /> |
||
<br /> |
|||
The GPN videos are still available in some libraries in the US and possibly Canada. However I'm not very sure about the Canadian libraries. Confirmation is needed. |
The GPN videos are still available in some libraries in the US and possibly Canada. However I'm not very sure about the Canadian libraries. Confirmation is needed. |
||
<br /> |
|||
The original post has an n-POV issue. ''a bold new concept- TV that children took seriously'' is positive fluff that conveys no actual facts. |
The original post has an n-POV issue. ''a bold new concept- TV that children took seriously'' is positive fluff that conveys no actual facts. |
||
Revision as of 00:04, 25 November 2007
Television Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
I took out The first season, beginning in October 1992, introduced a bold new television concept- TV that took children seriously. Some highlights from this season include: and replaced it with Highlights from the first season, which premiered in October 1992, include:
Request for information
GPN is only allowed to sell Ghostwriter to schools and libraries starting mid-2007 due to a change in licensing terms. The details of this change are unknown. If anyone has information, please contribute.
The GPN videos are still available in some libraries in the US and possibly Canada. However I'm not very sure about the Canadian libraries. Confirmation is needed.
The original post has an n-POV issue. a bold new concept- TV that children took seriously is positive fluff that conveys no actual facts.
I think this ought to be a separate article, instead of a redirect to here. After all, it was a separate series. If anyone can add info to it that would be great. Grandmasterka 04:29, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
It was only for one season though. Doesn't seem worth it.