Talk:Longy School of Music of Bard College: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:18, 6 December 2007

Template:WikiProject Music This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the [[Category:Music stub]] (and recursive categories) on the article page.

If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Music |class=stub |importance=}} above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.

Tone of recent edits

This is an encyclopedia article, not an advertisement for the school or an alumni page. Please re-write in a neutral tone, avoiding peacock terms. Also do not use "we". It's unencyclopedic and it strongly suggests a conflict of interest by the authors, which reduces rather than enhances the article's credibility. Thanks, Voceditenore 14:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edits

Voceditenore, thank you for taking an interest in our project! I did not even think to check the the talk page on here until your name came up in class the other day. I have been working hard to improve the neutrality of my comments, and I figured that simply updating the history would be easy enough. If you have any more suggestions, I'm all ears! Deep-fried twinkie (talk) 18:48, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most recent edit I'm starting to look at other conservatory wiki pages, so I added the information about the degree programs. Let me know what you think! Deep-fried twinkie (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've fixed the referencing in the article. On the whole, Wikipedia prefers footnotes rather than the embedded links you were using because of the difficulties in associating them with their appropriate full references. I also removed repetitive external links, and moved some to the references section. You'll find this article useful: Wikipedia:Citing sources, especially Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Footnote_referencing for a guide of how to mark up the footnotes. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 02:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that looks so much better! I knew there was a way to do footnotes, but I hadn't taken the time to learn how to do the code properly. I'll share the links you provided with the others. It's very helpful! Deep-fried twinkie (talk) 19:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

The pictures look great! Zoe zelda (talk) 12:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 [[User:Deep-fried twinkie|Deep-fried twinkie]] ([[User talk:Deep-fried twinkie|talk]]) 19:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 :Hi, I've fixed the referencing in the article. On the whole, Wikipedia prefers footnotes rather than the embedded links you were using because of the difficulties in associating them with their appropriate full references. I also removed repetitive external links, and moved some to the references section.  You'll find this article useful: [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]], especially [[Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Footnote_referencing]] for a guide of how to mark up the footnotes. Best, [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 02:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
+::Wow, that looks so much better!  I knew there was a way to do footnotes, but I hadn't taken the time to learn how to do the code properly.  I'll share the links you provided with the others.  It's very helpful! [[User:Deep-fried twinkie|Deep-fried twinkie]] ([[User talk:Deep-fried twinkie|talk]]) 19:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 === Pictures ===