User talk:Aecis

Archives

1. Messages 1-12 (August 2004 - July 2005)

2. Messages 13-24 (July - August 2005)

3. Messages 25-36 (September - November 2005)

4. Messages 37-48 (November - December 2005)

5. Messages 49-60 (December 2005 - January 2006)

6. Messages 61-72 (January 2006)

7. Messages 73-84 (January - February 2006)

8. Messages 85-96 (February 2006)

9. Messages 97-108 (February - May 2006)

10. Messages 109-120 (May - August 2006)

11. Messages 121-132 (September - October 2006)

12. Messages 133-144 (October 2006)

13. Messages 145-156 (October 2006)

14. Messages 157-168 (October - November 2006)

15. Messages 169-180 (November 2006)

16. Messages 181-192 (November - December 2006)

17. Messages 193-204 (December 2006)

18. Messages 205-216 (December 2006 - January 2007)

19. Messages 217-228 (January 2007)

20. Messages 229-240 (January 2007)

21. Messages 241-252 (January - February 2007)

22. Messages 253-264 (February 2007)

23. Messages 265-276 (February - March 2007)

24. Messages 277-288 (March - April 2007)

25. Messages 289-300 (April - May 2007)

26. Messages 301-312 (May 2007)

27. Messages 313-324 (May - June 2007)

28. Messages 325-336 (June 2007)

29. Messages 337-348 (June - July 2007)

30. Messages 349-360 (July - September 2007)

31. Messages 361-372 (September - October 2007)

32. Messages 373-384 (October - November 2007)

33. Messages 385-396 (November - December 2007)

Wikipedia Signpost

1. Wikipedia Signpost 1-12

2. Wikipedia Signpost 13-24

3. Wikipedia Signpost 25-36

4. Wikipedia Signpost 37-48

5. Wikipedia Signpost 49-60

Newsletters

1. WikiProject Alternative music

2. WikiProject Military history

Eh?

[1]--Doc^g 01:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

OK, got your reasoning.--Doc^g 01:18, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Royal Leerdam

Hallo Aecis, Het inkorten van het artikel akkoord. Berlage had wel een link/Danone heb ik er nog maar aan toegevoegd/Delftware (exportproduct/imago) kan m.i. niet onbreken, zelfs als je gaat schrappen. Tenslotte Glasstad Leerdam: Rond Royal Leerdam van levensbelang. Lijstje musea weg: ja waarom eigenlijk? Zo wordt het een bedrijvenartikel en mijn doel was nou juist een glasstukje te schrijven. Ik weet het je kunt het niet iedereen naar de zin maken. Het lijkt wel een bedrijfssanering. Nou ja, je kijkt maar c.q. doet maar. Mijn aanvankelijke akkoord is dat eigenlijk ook niet meer. Cheers--GerardusS (talk) 07:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC) Aansluitend Aecis, ik zie eigenlijk nu pas, dat het artikel is gelinked naar Nederlandse bedrijven. Ik had al het gevoel dat er iets niet klopte. De rest zou ik het liefst tussen enorme haken zetten: Royal Delft spreekt over de overname van 20 man en een omzet van enkele miljoenen. Dat willen we toch niet aan de grote klok hangen, dat we hier eigenlijk praten over een patattent, alleen wel een met een enorme uitstraling. Collectors, musea ,stromen toeristen in Leerdam. Dat was mijn insteek. Overdenk het a.u.b. nog eens.--GerardusS (talk) 08:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Better?

Will appreciate your comments --Shompi (talk) 02:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Gazh etc.

We're completely in sync now, Aecis. Why I contacted you and Fram during the RfA was because I was sure that the two of you understood exactly what I meant by my last comment on Gazh's talk page. When I saw what you said at the RfA, it was obvious that I had made a big error in judgement in the comment. There was no point in me protesting anymore why I said it because, like you commented on my talk page, it's not just what you say but how you say it.

It was far too rash a way to phrase what I intended to say. Looking back at it now, I'm know that it must have sounded like a "buzz off" rather than the "calm down" that it was meant to be. Coming after my comments on English Potato Famine - especially Gazh's response to my comments and since I had interacted with Gazh on a friendly basis before - it's clear that he would have interpreted it as me coming to his defense. His attack afterwards, which I didn't see until the RfA, was, I'm sure, aimed at you and Fram on the belief that I was on his side ("Et's above en beyon many not frem these lans." = "It's beyond those not from these lands.")

There's nothing else to be said about it. My hands are up. The two of you are right. What I wrote was wrong. --sony-youth^pléigh 00:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Your request about a change to the Page on Milovan Destil Marković

Hello, sorry for the late reply. I think I understand why the paragraph might be a bit confusing to understand and I will try to rewrite it. However I poured a glas of water over my router back home so I only am able to go online at uni, so it'll only be done in the next minutes. I also have a question: Milovan Destil Marković -> do you think that I should make some redirect page where the Marković ć is without the accent? Or is Wikipedia not case sensitive? Am not a pro yet... Or maybe for De Stil Markovic. If the artist is still using that name. Should be contributing a few more articles on contemporary artists over the next weeks. Have a good Christmas, Ben

Changed what I thought was the confusing bit (guess the phrase just got a litte long there...). I hope it's now understandable B.stegmayer (talk) 11:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

I've given a response to B.stegmeyer [2] following the link from the WikiProject Visual Arts. As ever it all comes down to facts and references.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 22:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

APM Terminals

I've redone the page and posted it in my personal space. Would you mind reviewing the content and then giving me some constructive criticism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bertatmindcomet (talk • contribs) 23:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I've made the revisions that you have suggested. Do you feel that the "Environmental & Safety Efforts" section should be altogether removed?