User talk:88.111.83.82: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
copying these entries to the member's own talk page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am afraid the article as appended is disingenuous to cricket historians everywhere and if you would, as I suggested constructively, that you go to the association of cricket statisticians website you will find a review of Mr Leach's so called research. I would also ask you if it is Mr Leach who has written his own article. Such claims should be supported by authorative citations. The article as appended is a disgrace to Wikipedia and merely confirms to view of the narrow minded minority who question it ---- richard daft==December 2007== |
'''Note''' that I have copied the entries below to the [[User talk:Richard Daft]] talk page as it is clear that [[User:Richard Daft]] is the person responsible for the edits done by this previously anonymous IP address. --[[User:AlbertMW|AlbertMW]] ([[User talk:AlbertMW|talk]]) 15:54, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
I am afraid the article as appended is disingenuous to cricket historians everywhere and if you would, as I suggested constructively, that you go to the association of cricket statisticians website you will find a review of Mr Leach's so called research. I would also ask you if it is Mr Leach who has written his own article. Such claims should be supported by authorative citations. The article as appended is a disgrace to Wikipedia and merely confirms to view of the narrow minded minority who question it ---- richard daft |
|||
==December 2007== |
|||
{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> --[[User:Jpeeling|Jpeeling]] ([[User talk:Jpeeling|talk]]) 20:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC) |
{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> --[[User:Jpeeling|Jpeeling]] ([[User talk:Jpeeling|talk]]) 20:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 15:54, 26 December 2007
Note that I have copied the entries below to the User talk:Richard Daft talk page as it is clear that User:Richard Daft is the person responsible for the edits done by this previously anonymous IP address. --AlbertMW (talk) 15:54, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
I am afraid the article as appended is disingenuous to cricket historians everywhere and if you would, as I suggested constructively, that you go to the association of cricket statisticians website you will find a review of Mr Leach's so called research. I would also ask you if it is Mr Leach who has written his own article. Such claims should be supported by authorative citations. The article as appended is a disgrace to Wikipedia and merely confirms to view of the narrow minded minority who question it ---- richard daft
December 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Jpeeling (talk) 20:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)