Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam and domestic violence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Calliopejen1 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*Be careful of "we don't have [list of redlinks]" arguments. Remember [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nudity in Judaism]]. ☺ [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 21:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC) |
*Be careful of "we don't have [list of redlinks]" arguments. Remember [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nudity in Judaism]]. ☺ [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 21:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
* '''Strong keep'''. If there is published research on the other religions and domestic violence then start an article by all means. Read the reference section of this article--tons of research has been published on this topic. There is no undue weight by having this here - if anything, it reduces the discussion of this issue in other articles. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|talk]]) 21:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC) |
* '''Strong keep'''. If there is published research on the other religions and domestic violence then start an article by all means. Read the reference section of this article--tons of research has been published on this topic. There is no undue weight by having this here - if anything, it reduces the discussion of this issue in other articles. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|talk]]) 21:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''STRONG DELETE''' - This is nothing more than some kind of attack page, and a bigoted one at that. There is already a page on [[Criticism of Islam]], which should have what useful information is within this article <b>merged</b> into it. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 21:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:43, 27 December 2007
- Islam and domestic violence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
We don't have an article on Christianity and domestic violence, Judaism and domestic violence, Buddhism and domestic violence, Hinduism and domestic violence, or any others that I can see. This article is a POV fork of materials that could be better discussed in more generalized articles (and many of them already are, so merging is probably unnecessary). By lumping together a large number of disparate phenomena under the banner of "Islam and domestic violence," this article violates our prohibition on original research by synthesis. A separate article on the subject also potentially constitutes undue weight. *** Crotalus *** 21:30, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Be careful of "we don't have [list of redlinks]" arguments. Remember Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nudity in Judaism. ☺ Uncle G (talk) 21:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep. If there is published research on the other religions and domestic violence then start an article by all means. Read the reference section of this article--tons of research has been published on this topic. There is no undue weight by having this here - if anything, it reduces the discussion of this issue in other articles. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- STRONG DELETE - This is nothing more than some kind of attack page, and a bigoted one at that. There is already a page on Criticism of Islam, which should have what useful information is within this article merged into it. Atari400 21:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)